Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104138›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Safety and efficacy of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab alternating with nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: the non-randomised, open-label, phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 920 trial.

Daniel J George, David R Spigel, Lucio N Gordan, Samith T Kochuparambil, Ana M Molina, Jeff Yorio, Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty, Heidi McKean, Nishan Tchekmedyian, Scott S Tykodi and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02982954 (Phase 3b/4 Safety Trial of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Advanced or Metastatic RCC), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02982954 phase4completednot on this map

Phase 3b/4 Safety Trial of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Advanced or Metastatic RCC (CheckMate 920: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 920)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2017 to 2021Enrolled211ConditionsRenal Cell CarcinomaArmsNivolumab, Ipilimumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel J GeorgeDivision of Medical Oncology and Urology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA daniel.george@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0836-8542
David R SpigelLung Cancer Research Program, Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Lucio N GordanDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Florida Cancer Specialists North/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Samith T KochuparambilDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Minnesota Oncology, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Ana M MolinaDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.
Jeff YorioDepartment of Medical Oncology, Texas Oncology, Austin, Texas, USA.
Arash Rezazadeh KalebastyDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Norton Cancer Institute, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Heidi McKeanDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Avera, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.
Nishan TchekmedyianPacific Shores Medical Group (Pacific Shores Medical Group is now part of City of Hope), Huntington Beach, California, USA.
Scott S TykodiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0399-0965
Joshua ZhangDepartment of Clinical Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Margarita AskelsonDepartment of Biostatistics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Jennifer L JohansenUS Medical Immunology and Fibrosis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Thomas E HutsonDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Bryan, Texas, USA.
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USSarah Cannon · USAvera Health · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USCornell University · USDuke University · USMinnesota Oncology · USNorton Healthcare · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · USTexas Oncology · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe non-randomised, open-label, phase IIIb/IV multicohort CheckMate 920 trial explored the safety and efficacy with a less frequent, but continual nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) dosing regimen (cohort 1) to determine whether this modification could potentially retain efficacy benefits while improving on the manageable safety profile previously observed with this combination in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC).

settingPatients were enrolled from 48 largely community-based sites in the USA.

participants106 patients with previously untreated, predominantly clear cell aRCC received treatment.

interventionsPatients received NIVO 6 mg/kg plus IPI 1 mg/kg on day 1 of the first week of each 8-week cycle; the combination alternated with NIVO 480 mg monotherapy on day 1 of the fifth week of each 8-week cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or study end. The maximum treatment duration was 2 years. The primary endpoint was the incidence of high-grade (grade 3/4 and grade 5) immune-mediated adverse events (IMAEs) within 100 days of the last dose. Select secondary endpoints included time to onset and resolution of high-grade IMAEs, progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events and the overall survival (OS) were the exploratory endpoints.

resultsThe most common grade 3/4 IMAEs were diarrhoea/colitis (7.5%) and rash (6.6%) and no grade 5 IMAEs occurred, with a minimum follow-up of 28.5 months. The median PFS was 4.8 (95% CI 3.0 to 8.3) months, the ORR in evaluable patients (n=96) was 34.4% (95% CI 25.0 to 44.8), and the median OS was not reached (95% CI 24.8 months to not estimable).

conclusionsWhile no new safety signals were reported with less frequent, but continual NIVO+IPI dosing in CheckMate 920, the modified regimen was not associated with clinical benefits relative to the approved NIVO+IPI dose. These results support the continued use of the currently approved NIVO+IPI combination dosing schedule for patients with aRCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02982954.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsHumansIpilimumabNivolumabIpilimumabNivolumabclinical trialsimmunologykidney tumoursoncology

Identifiers

PMID36104138
PMCPMC9476127
OpenAlexW4295681502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.