ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2023
Successful stopping of biologic therapy for remission in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stopping of adalimumab in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis (ADJUST): a multicentre, double-masked, randomised controlled trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Treatment patterns of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a population-based study in Korea.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Article
- Novel advances in juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2026Review
- Evaluation of adalimumab tapering regimens in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in remission: a simulation study.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of rheumatic drugs and their indications in paediatric and adolescent care.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Predictors of relapse after withdrawing biotherapies in children with inactive juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a retrospective cohort study of the JIR cohort.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Article
- Can We Successfully Discontinue Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Treatment in Children with Non-Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis? The Experience of a Tertiary Center.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Recurrence Risk in Pediatric Noninfectious Uveitis During Adalimumab Tapering: An International Multicenter Retrospective Study.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Outcomes of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis receiving biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a retrospective single-centre experience from India.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025Article
- Clinical remission rate and drug withdrawal status in articular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Observational
- Update on Biologic Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Five-year Narrative Review.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2025Review
- Anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF) weaning strategy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): does duration matter?Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- The clinical and experimental treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2023Review
- Development and Qualitative Evaluation of a Decision Support Tool for Withdrawal of Biologic Therapy in Nonsystemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesClinicians concerned about long-term safety of biologics in JIA may consider tapering or stopping treatment once remission is achieved despite uncertainty in maintaining drug-free remission. This analysis aims to (i) calculate how many patients with JIA stop biologics for remission, (ii) calculate how many later re-start therapy and after how long, and (iii) identify factors associated with re-starting biologics.
methodsPatients starting biologics between 1 January 2010 and 7 September 2021 in the UK JIA Biologics Register were included. Patients stopping biologics for physician-reported remission, those re-starting biologics and factors associated with re-starting, were identified. Multiple imputation accounted for missing data.
resultsOf 1451 patients with median follow-up of 2.7 years (IQR 1.4, 4.0), 269 (19%) stopped biologics for remission after a median of 2.2 years (IQR 1.7, 3.0). Of those with follow-up data (N = 220), 118 (54%) later re-started therapy after a median of 4.7 months, with 84% re-starting the same biologic. Patients on any-line tocilizumab (prior to stopping) were less likely to re-start biologics (vs etanercept; odds ratio [OR] 0.3; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.7), while those with a longer disease duration prior to biologics (OR 1.1 per year increase; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.2) or prior uveitis were more likely to re-start biologics (OR 2.5; 95% CI: 1.3, 4.9).
conclusionsThis analysis identified factors associated with successful cessation of biologics for remission in JIA as absence of uveitis, prior treatment with tocilizumab and starting biologics earlier in the disease course. Further research is needed to guide clinical recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.