Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104059›Full record

Trial reportSaudi medical journal2022

Clinical efficacy of ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing microwave ablation.

Özlem Öz Gergin, Sibel Seçkin Pehlivan, İbrahim Erkan, Adnan Bayram, Recep Aksu, Cihangir Biçer, Karamehmet Yıldız, Güven Kahriman

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Saudi medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Özlem Öz GerginFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Gergin, Pehlivan, Erkan, Bayram, Aksu, Biçer, Yıldız), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University; and Department of Radiology (Kahriman), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Sibel Seçkin PehlivanFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Gergin, Pehlivan, Erkan, Bayram, Aksu, Biçer, Yıldız), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University; and Department of Radiology (Kahriman), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
İbrahim ErkanFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Gergin, Pehlivan, Erkan, Bayram, Aksu, Biçer, Yıldız), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University; and Department of Radiology (Kahriman), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Adnan BayramFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Gergin, Pehlivan, Erkan, Bayram, Aksu, Biçer, Yıldız), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University; and Department of Radiology (Kahriman), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Recep AksuFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Gergin, Pehlivan, Erkan, Bayram, Aksu, Biçer, Yıldız), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University; and Department of Radiology (Kahriman), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Cihangir BiçerFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Gergin, Pehlivan, Erkan, Bayram, Aksu, Biçer, Yıldız), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University; and Department of Radiology (Kahriman), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Karamehmet YıldızFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Gergin, Pehlivan, Erkan, Bayram, Aksu, Biçer, Yıldız), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University; and Department of Radiology (Kahriman), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Güven KahrimanFrom the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Gergin, Pehlivan, Erkan, Bayram, Aksu, Biçer, Yıldız), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University; and Department of Radiology (Kahriman), Medical Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Erciyes University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the effect of pre-emptive erector spinae plane block (ESPB) applied before the procedure on opioid consumption during the procedure and analgesic demand and opioid consumption after the procedure.

methodsAmerican Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) I-II, 30 patients, with liver tumor and planned for microwave ablation (MWA) treatment were included in the interventional radiology clinic, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey, Turkey between 2021 and 2022. Patients were randomized either to the ESPB or control group. Ultrasound-guided ESPB block with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was performed preoperatively in the ESPB group patients, and the patients who was not performed the ESPB the control group. All the patients were administered 1 µg/kg fentanyl, 1-2 mg/kg propofol, and 1 mg/kg ketamine for sedation during the MWA procedure after standard monitoring. Total opioid consumption and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for pain were recorded at 0, 20, 40, and 60 minutes, and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours after the procedure.

resultsTotal opioid consumption and total opioid amount during the procedure were statistically significantly lower in the ESPB group (

Indexed as

Nerve BlockAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalFentanylHumansMicrowavesPostoperative PainTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, InterventionalAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalFentanylerector spinae plane blockhepatocellular carcinomamicrowave ablationpainultrasonography guidance

Identifiers

PMID36104059
PMCPMC9987667
OpenAlexW4295563303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.