ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
The role of routine groin ultrasonography in the management of inguinal hernia.
Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of upright ultrasonography for groin hernia compared with laparoscopic findings: a single-center study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGroin ultrasonography (US) has been used as an adjunct to inguinal hernia diagnosis, but there is limited evidence as to whether its use affects surgical decision-making. The primary aim of this study was to examine whether groin US affects surgical management of inguinal hernia; the secondary goal was to estimate the frequency of groin US ordered before surgical consultation.
methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of 400 consecutive patients aged older than 18 years referred to 1 of 4 general surgeons in Calgary, Alberta, for inguinal hernia between January 2014 and January 2015. Bilateral groin examinations were entered as separate entries into the database. Outcomes assessed included the frequency of groin US examinations performed within 1 year before the general surgery consultation, presence of inguinal hernia on clinical examination (CE), presence of inguinal hernia on groin US, and whether the hernia proceeded to herniorrhaphy.
resultsA total of 476 groins in the 400 patients (354 [88.5%] male; mean age 53.5 yr [standard deviation 15.2 yr]) were evaluated for a hernia during the study period. Groin US was performed before general surgery consultation in 336 cases (70.6%). Overall, 364 (76.5%) of the hernias were clinically palpable; of the 364, 220 (60.4%) had preconsultation US, even in the presence of a positive CE finding. Of the 112 groins that did not have a clinically palpable hernia, 103 (92.0%) underwent preconsultation US. Of the 476 groins, 315 (66.2%) underwent inguinal hernia repair: 310 (85.2%) of the 364 with clinically palpable hernias and 5 (4.8%) of the 103 with clinically negative findings but positive groin US findings. Surgical decision-making based on CE findings occurred in 390 cases (81.9%) overall, whereas surgery based on groin US findings alone occurred in 5 of 336 cases (1.5%).
conclusionRoutine groin US was frequently performed before general surgery consultation, whether a hernia was detectable on clinical examination or not. Positive groin US results alone infrequently affected whether the patient proceeded to surgery. Clinical examination findings played a larger role in surgical decision-making than groin US results. Eliminating the practice of routine groin US may provide considerable health care cost savings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.