Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36104029›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group2022

Proactive esophageal cooling protects against thermal insults during high-power short-duration radiofrequency cardiac ablation.

Marcela Mercado Montoya, Tatiana Gomez Bustamante, Enrique Berjano, Steven R Mickelsen, James D Daniels, Pablo Hernandez Arango, Jay Schieber, Erik Kulstad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marcela Mercado MontoyaIn Silico Science & Engineering S.A.S, Medellin, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1453-4690
Tatiana Gomez BustamanteIn Silico Science & Engineering S.A.S, Medellin, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-3947-1390
Enrique BerjanoBioMIT, Department of Electronic Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3247-2665
Steven R MickelsenElectrophysiology Department, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4219-8230
James D DanielsElectrophysiology Department, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3360-6175
Pablo Hernandez ArangoIn Silico Science & Engineering S.A.S, Medellin, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6383-7770
Jay SchieberDepartments of Chemical Engineering, Physics, and Applied Mathematics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9644-5236
Erik KulstadElectrophysiology Department, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9331-8266

Funding

Utility of Esophageal Cooling Therapy for the Prevention of Thermal Injury During Atrial FibrillationR44HL158375 · NHLBI · ADVANCED COOLING THERAPY, LLC · PI CALLANS, DAVID J, KULSTAD, ERIK BENJAMIN · 2021 to 2023
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R44 HL158375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProactive cooling with a novel cooling device has been shown to reduce endoscopically identified thermal injury during radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation using medium power settings. We aimed to evaluate the effects of proactive cooling during high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation.

methodsA computer model accounting for the left atrium (1.5 mm thickness) and esophagus including the active cooling device was created. We used the Arrhenius equation to estimate the esophageal thermal damage during 50 W/ 10 s and 90 W/ 4 s RF ablations.

resultsWith proactive esophageal cooling in place, temperatures in the esophageal tissue were significantly reduced from control conditions without cooling, and the resulting percentage of damage to the esophageal wall was reduced around 50%, restricting damage to the epi-esophageal region and consequently sparing the remainder of the esophageal tissue, including the mucosal surface. Lesions in the atrial wall remained transmural despite cooling, and maximum width barely changed (<0.8 mm).

conclusionsProactive esophageal cooling significantly reduces temperatures and the resulting fraction of damage in the esophagus during HPSD ablation. These findings offer a mechanistic rationale explaining the high degree of safety encountered to date using proactive esophageal cooling, and further underscore the fact that temperature monitoring is inadequate to avoid thermal damage to the esophagus.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationBody TemperatureEsophagusHeart AtriaHumansAtrial fibrillationatrioesophageal fistulaesophageal coolingmathematical modelingradiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID36104029
PMCPMC9771690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.