ArticleJournal of animal science2022
The nutritive value of soybean meal from different sources for sows during mid- and late gestation.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of Digestible and Metabolizable Energy in Swine Feed Using Machine Learning.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Determination and Prediction of the Energy Content and Amino Acid Digestibility of Enzymolytic Soybean Meal for Growing Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Determination and prediction of net energy of soybean meal fed to pregnant sows by indirect calorimetry.Animal bioscience · 2025Article
- Nutritional values of soybean meal from different sources in multiparous sows.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of energy and nutrient utilization for corn, barley, and wheat bran in primiparous and multiparous sows during the gestation, lactation, and post-weaning period.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Effects of multienzyme supplementation on energy and nutrient digestibility in various feed ingredients for pregnant gilts.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Digestible and metabolizable energy in soybean meal and soybean hulls when fed to growing pigs or sows.Translational animal science · 2025Article
- The Biotechnological Potential of Crickets as a Sustainable Protein Source for Fishmeal Replacement in Aquafeed.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2024Review
- Energy Values and Standardized Ileal Digestibility of Amino Acids in Fermented Soybean Meal Fed to Growing Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Amino acid standardized ileal digestibility together with concentrations of digestible and metabolizable energy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast and soybean meal for gestating sows.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in soybean meal fed to non-pregnant and pregnant sows.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Effects of feeding levels on ileal amino acid digestibility of extruded full fat soybeans in nongestating sows.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in extruded full-fat soybean fed to non-gestating, gestating, and lactating sows.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Nutritional values of cottonseed meal from different sources fed to gestating and non-pregnant sows.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A precise understanding of the nutritive value of soybean meal (SBM) for pregnant sow is required for accurate feeding. Hence, we evaluated the nutritive value of 11 SBM samples from different sources for sows during mid and late gestation. In total, 24 mid-gestating sows (parity three; 230.3 ± 12.0 kg on day 37 of gestation) and 24 late-gestating sows (parity three; 238.8 ± 20.9 kg on day 72 of gestation) were assigned to a replicated 12 × 3 Youden square design with 12 diets and 3 periods. The 12 diets included a corn-based diet and 11 diets containing 25.50% SBMs from different sources. After 5-d adaptation, urine and feces were collected for 5 d. Although the chemical characteristics of SBM varied between samples, no differences were observed in digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter, gross energy, crude fiber, and neutral detergent fiber values in SBMs fed to both animal groups. However, de-hulled SBM 4 from Brazil displayed greater ATTD for nitrogen (N) in late-gestating sows (P < 0.05); animals displayed significantly (P < 0.01) greater ME, ME:DE ratio, and N net utilization values when compared with mid-gestating sows. The chemical composition of SBMs can be used to predict DE and ME values. In conclusion, ME, ME:DE ratio, and N net utilization SBM values for late-gestating sows were greater than in mid-gestating sows. Therefore, we should consider differences in ME values for SBMs when formulating diets for sows in mid and late gestation periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.