Trial reportJCO precision oncology2022
Addition of Germline Testing to Tumor-Only Sequencing Improves Detection of Pathogenic Germline Variants in Men With Advanced Prostate Cancer.
Trial report in JCO precision oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03328091 (Genetic Counseling Processes and Outcomes Among Males With Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Genetic Counseling Processes and Outcomes Among Males With Prostate Cancer (ProGen)
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Germline and somatic testing for homologous repair deficiency in patients with prostate cancer (part 1 of 2).Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Guideline
- Assessing the contribution of rare protein-coding germline variants to prostate cancer risk and severity in 37,184 cases.Nature communications · 2025Pooled it
- Evolving role of biomarkers beyond prostate‑specific antigen in refining prostate cancer screening: From blood‑based tests to urinary and genetic markers (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Homologous recombination repair and breast cancer gene testing in prostate cancer: expert perspectives and practical guidance on best practice from sample acquisition to biomarker-informed clinical decision-making.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Homologous recombination repair genetic testing variables and diagnostic paths for prostate cancer patients: a multicenter cohort study.The oncologist · 2025Observational
- Implementation of Universal Germline Genetic Testing Into Standard of Care for Patients With Prostate Cancer: The Time Is Now.JCO oncology practice · 2025Article
- Genomic and transcriptomic sequencing in prostate cancer.Current opinion in oncology · 2025Review
- Establishment of a comprehensive set of fact sheets for cancer predisposition genes for medical oncologists practicing cancer genome profiling.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Characterising the contribution of rare protein-coding germline variants to prostate cancer risk and severity in 37,184 cases.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Racial Differences in Germline Genetic Testing Completion Among Males With Pancreatic, Breast, or Metastatic Prostate Cancers.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2024Article
- Article
- A novel system to provide information via online YouTube videos and an evaluation of current online information about hereditary breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Article
- 2023 Canadian Urological Association guideline: Genetic testing in prostate cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeGuidelines recommend somatic and germline testing for men with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Barriers to widespread implementation result in underutilization of germline testing. Somatic testing alone risks missing pathogenic germline variants (PGVs). We sought to determine whether the addition of germline testing to tumor-only sequencing improves detection of PGVs in men with advanced PCa. Secondarily, we sought to define the added value of combining somatic and germline testing to optimize detection of clinically actionable alterations. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe analyzed results of independent germline testing and tumor-only sequencing from 100 men with advanced PCa from a prospective clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03328091). The primary outcome was the proportion of PGVs not reported with tumor-only sequencing. The secondary outcome was the association of locus-specific loss of heterozygosity for PGVs in homologous recombination genes with clinical-genomic features.
resultsIn the 100 men who underwent germline testing and tumor-only sequencing, 24 PGVs were identified, 17 of which were clinically actionable, in 23 patients. Tumor-only sequencing failed to report four (17%) of the PGVs. One additional PGV (4.2%) had variant allele frequency on tumor-sequencing below the threshold for follow-up germline testing. When integrating tumor-only sequencing with germling testing results, 33% of patients harbored clinically actionable alterations. Rates of locus-specific loss of heterozygosity were higher for
conclusionTumor-only sequencing failed to report more than 20% of PGVs in men with advanced PCa. These findings strongly support guideline recommendations for universal germline and somatic testing in this population. Combining tumor and germline sequencing doubled the chance of detecting a clinically actionable alteration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.