Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36103600›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2022

Controlling Superselectivity of Multivalent Interactions with Cofactors and Competitors.

Tine Curk, Galina V Dubacheva, Alain R Brisson, Ralf P Richter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Receptor clustering tunes and sharpens the selectivity of multivalent binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Hyaluronan in the pathogenesis of acute and post-acute COVID-19 infection.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tine CurkDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2167-5336
Galina V DubachevaDépartement de Chimie Moléculaire, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS UMR 5250, 38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1417-5381
Alain R BrissonUMR-CBMN, CNRS-University of Bordeaux-IPB, 33600 Pessac, France.
Ralf P RichterSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, School of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, and Bragg Centre for Materials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3071-2837

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T001631/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moieties that compete with multivalent interactions or act as cofactors are common in living systems, but their effect on multivalent binding remains poorly understood. We derive a theoretical model that shows how the superselectivity of multivalent interactions is modulated by the presence of cofactors or competitors. We find that the role of these participating moieties can be fully captured by a simple rescaling of the affinity constant of the individual ligand-receptor bonds. Theoretical predictions are supported by experimental data of the membrane repair protein annexin A5 binding to anionic lipid membranes in the presence of Ca

Indexed as

Hyaluronic AcidReceptors, Cell SurfaceAnnexin A5LigandsLipidsOligosaccharidesAnnexin A5Hyaluronic AcidLigandsLipidsOligosaccharidesReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID36103600
PMCPMC9523699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.