Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36103580›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Using phylogenetics to infer HIV-1 transmission direction between known transmission pairs.

Christian Julian Villabona-Arenas, Stéphane Hué, James A C Baxter, Matthew Hall, Katrina A Lythgoe, John Bradley, Katherine E Atkins

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian Julian Villabona-ArenasDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9928-3968
Stéphane HuéDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8580-6905
James A C BaxterCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, United Kingdom.
Matthew HallBig Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.
Katrina A LythgoeBig Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7089-7680
John BradleyDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9449-4608
Katherine E AtkinsDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5250-0558
Yale University · USUniversity of Oxford · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1Royal Society (The Royal Society) 107652/Z/15/ZUKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) 2259239UKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/R010161/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inferring the transmission direction between linked individuals living with HIV provides unparalleled power to understand the epidemiology that determines transmission. Phylogenetic ancestral-state reconstruction approaches infer the transmission direction by identifying the individual in whom the most recent common ancestor of the virus populations originated. While these methods vary in accuracy, it is unclear why. To evaluate the performance of phylogenetic ancestral-state reconstruction to determine the transmission direction of HIV-1 infection, we inferred the transmission direction for 112 transmission pairs where transmission direction and detailed additional information were available. We then fit a statistical model to evaluate the extent to which epidemiological, sampling, genetic, and phylogenetic factors influenced the outcome of the inference. Finally, we repeated the analysis under real-life conditions with only routinely available data. We found that whether ancestral-state reconstruction correctly infers the transmission direction depends principally on the phylogeny's topology. For example, under real-life conditions, the probability of identifying the correct transmission direction increases from 32%-when a monophyletic-monophyletic or paraphyletic-polyphyletic tree topology is observed and when the tip closest to the root does not agree with the state at the root-to 93% when a paraphyletic-monophyletic topology is observed and when the tip closest to the root agrees with the root state. Our results suggest that documenting larger differences in relative intrahost diversity increases our confidence in the transmission direction inference of linked pairs for population-level studies of HIV. These findings provide a practical starting point to determine our confidence in transmission direction inference from ancestral-state reconstruction.

Indexed as

HIV-1HIV InfectionsSexual PartnersFemaleHumansMaleModels, StatisticalPhylogenyancestral-state reconstructionHIV-1 epidemiologyLasso regressionphylogenetic tree topologywho acquires infection from whom

Identifiers

PMID36103580
PMCPMC9499565
OpenAlexW4295706190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.