Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36103526›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Exosome-mediated delivery of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes for tissue-specific gene therapy of liver diseases.

Tao Wan, Jiafeng Zhong, Qi Pan, Tianhua Zhou, Yuan Ping, Xiangrui Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. RNA therapeutics: current status and future directions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Nature Inspired Delivery Vehicles for CRISPR-Based Genome Editing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tao WanLiangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 311121, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8299-8921
Jiafeng ZhongDepartment of Pharmacology and Department of Gastroenterology of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2020-3326
Qi PanCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1852-1387
Tianhua ZhouLiangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 311121, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1791-2124
Yuan PingLiangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 311121, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2571-7721
Xiangrui LiuLiangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 311121, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4960-5847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing has emerged as a powerful therapeutic technology, but the lack of safe and efficient in vivo delivery systems, especially for tissue-specific vectors, limits its broad clinical applications. Delivery of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) owns competitive advantages over other options; however, the large size of RNPs exceeds the loading capacity of currently available delivery vectors. Here, we report a previously unidentified genome editing delivery system, named exosome

Indexed as

ExosomesLiver DiseasesAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGenetic TherapyMiceRibonucleoproteinsRibonucleoproteins

Identifiers

PMID36103526
PMCPMC9473578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.