Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36103494›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Athletic trainers' viewpoints of patient-centered care: Preliminary findings.

Carly J Wilson, Lindsey E Eberman, Ansley S Redinger, Elizabeth R Neil, Zachary K Winkelmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reaching Underserved Communities in Partnership with Outreach Athletic Trainers.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Athletic Trainer's Varying Levels of Awareness and Use of Disablement Model Frameworks: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Examination of the Cumulative Risk Assessment and Nutritional Profiles among College Ballet Dancers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carly J WilsonDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.
Lindsey E EbermanDepartment of Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana, United States of America.
Ansley S RedingerSt. Luke's Health System, Boise, Idaho, United States of America.
Elizabeth R NeilCollege of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Zachary K WinkelmannDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8917-2068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The core competency of patient-centered care (PCC) states that for positive patient outcomes, the provider must respect the patient's views and recognize their experiences. The Athletic Training Strategic Alliance Research Agenda Task Force identified a profession-wide belief that examining the extent to which athletic trainers (ATs) provide PCC in their clinical practice would benefit the profession. To first address this line of inquiry, we must study the subjectivity of how ATs view PCC. This study used Q methodology which is a research design that collects data from participants from a quantitative and qualitative perspective. A total of 115 (males = 62, females = 53, age = 37±10 y, experience = 13±10 y) ATs dispersed between 11 job settings volunteered for this study. Participants were asked to pre-sort (agree, disagree, neutral) 36 validated statements representing the 8 dimensions of PCC, then completed a Q-sort where they dragged-and-dropped the pre-sorted statements based on perceived importance in providing PCC. The Q-sorts were analyzed using QMethod software. A principal component analysis was used to identify statement rankings and factors. Factors were determined by an Eigenvalue > 1 and analyzed using a scree plot. The 6 highest selected statements per factor were assessed to create the distinguishing viewpoints. Two distinguishing viewpoints emerged from the factor analysis of the Q-sorts: 1) the interpersonal connection that valued teamwork, open communication, and respectful care with varied populations; 2) the holistic gatekeeper that valued personal promotion for activities of daily living, self-care, and quality of life. Overall, ATs value patient's preferences and respect. However, a lack of importance was identified for incorporating the disablement model which is a core competency and adopted framework by the athletic training profession.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSportsActivities of Daily LivingAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID36103494
PMCPMC9473394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.