ArticleClinical chemistry2022
Identifying Clinically Relevant Bacteria Directly from Culture and Clinical Samples with a Handheld Mass Spectrometry Probe.
Article in Clinical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid Identification of Infections Directly from Isolates and Clinical Specimens with the MasSpec Pen Technology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Real-time monitoring of metabolic plasticity in Mycoplasma gallisepticum under varying nutrient conditions via DART-HRMS.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Recipient plasma metabolomics as a predictor of heart transplant severe primary graft dysfunction.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026Article
- Rapid Multi-Omics for Bacterial Identification Using Flow Injection-Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Review
- "Touch&Play" Wood Typification by the MasSpec Pen.Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS · 2025Article
- Universal, untargeted detection of bacteria in tissues using metabolomics workflows.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A Snapshot, Using a Multi-Omic Approach, of the Metabolic Cross-Talk and the Dynamics of the Resident Microbiota in Ripening Cheese Inoculated withFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Workflow for Meaningful Interpretation of Classification Results from Handheld Ambient Mass Spectrometry Analysis Probes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- HILIC-IM-MS for Simultaneous Lipid and Metabolite Profiling of Bacteria.ACS measurement science au · 2024Article
- Rapid and visual identification of β-lactamase subtypes for precision antibiotic therapy.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Applications of ambient ionization mass spectrometry in 2022: An annual review.Analytical science advances · 2023Review
- Rapid, Sensitive, and Versatile: A 5-Year Perspective on Applications of Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry in Bioanalytical Science.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRapid identification of bacteria is critical to prevent antimicrobial resistance and ensure positive patient outcomes. We have developed the MasSpec Pen, a handheld mass spectrometry-based device that enables rapid analysis of biological samples. Here, we evaluated the MasSpec Pen for identification of bacteria from culture and clinical samples.
methodsA total of 247 molecular profiles were obtained from 43 well-characterized strains of 8 bacteria species that are clinically relevant to osteoarticular infections, including Staphylococcus aureus, Group A and B Streptococcus, and Kingella kingae, using the MasSpec Pen coupled to a high-resolution mass spectrometer. The molecular profiles were used to generate statistical classifiers based on metabolites that were predictive of Gram stain category, genus, and species. Then, we directly analyzed samples from 4 patients, including surgical specimens and clinical isolates, and used the classifiers to predict the etiologic agent.
resultsHigh accuracies were achieved for all levels of classification with a mean accuracy of 93.3% considering training and validation sets. Several biomolecules were detected at varied abundances between classes, many of which were selected as predictive features in the classifiers including glycerophospholipids and quorum-sensing molecules. The classifiers also enabled correct identification of Gram stain type and genus of the etiologic agent from 3 surgical specimens and all classification levels for clinical specimen isolates.
conclusionsThe MasSpec Pen enables identification of several bacteria at different taxonomic levels in seconds from cultured samples and has potential for culture-independent identification of bacteria directly from clinical samples based on the detection of metabolic species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.