Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36103216›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2022

Social Media Perceptions and Internet Verification Skills Associated With Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Decision-Making Among Parents of Children and Adolescents: Cross-sectional Survey.

Erika L Thompson, Sharice M Preston, Jenny K R Francis, Serena A Rodriguez, Sandi L Pruitt, James-Michael Blackwell, Jasmin A Tiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A Mixed Methods Exploration of Social Media Use for Health Information in Under-Resourced Communities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erika L ThompsonDepartment of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7115-0001
Sharice M PrestonCenter for Pediatric Population Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8446-6953
Jenny K R FrancisDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Children's Health, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9090-4529
Serena A RodriguezDepartment of Health Promotion & Behavioral Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4466-6002
Sandi L PruittDepartment of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1007-9176
James-Michael BlackwellDepartment of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9137-3878
Jasmin A TiroDepartment of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8300-0441

Funding

Use of Long-Acting Reversible ContraceptionK23HD097291 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI FRANCIS, JENNY KRISTINE RODRIGUEZ · 2019 to 2023
$829k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD097291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is recommended for children aged 11-12 years in the United States. One factor that may contribute to low national HPV vaccine uptake is parental exposure to misinformation on social media.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine the association between parents' perceptions of the HPV vaccine information on social media and internet verification strategies used with the HPV vaccine decision-making stage for their child.

methodsParents of children and adolescents aged 9-17 years were recruited for a cross-sectional survey in North Texas (n=1192) and classified into 3 groups: children and adolescents who (1) were vaccinated, (2) unvaccinated and did not want the vaccine, and (3) unvaccinated and wanted the vaccine. Multinomial logistic regression models were estimated to identify factors associated with the HPV vaccine decision-making stage with children and adolescents who were vaccinated as the referent group.

resultsOf the 1192 respondents, 44.7% (n=533) had an HPV-vaccinated child, 38.8% (n=463) had an unvaccinated child and did not want the vaccine, and 16.4% (n=196) had an unvaccinated child and wanted the vaccine. Respondents were less likely to be "undecided/not wanting the vaccine" if they agreed that HPV information on social media is credible (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.60; P=.001), disagreed that social media makes them question the HPV vaccine (aOR 0.22, 95% CI 0.15-0.33; P<.001), or had a higher internet verification score (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88; P<.001).

conclusionsInterventions that promote web-based health literacy skills are needed so parents can protect their families from misinformation and make informed health care decisions.

Indexed as

adolescentschilddecisiondecision-makinghealthhealth careHPV vaccinationhuman papillomavirusinternetliteracymisinformationonlineparentsocial mediasurveyteenteensUnited StatesunvaccinatedUSAvaccinationvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36103216
PMCPMC9520398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.