ArticleJAMA network open2022
Estimated Cost of Developing a Therapeutic Complex Medical Device in the US.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigation of Vestibular Dysfunction Requires Renewed Research Enthusiasm.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Pooled it
- Reported best practices for effective risk management of medical devices: a scoping review.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Pooled it
- Regulatory Adoption of AI, ML, Computational Modeling & Simulation in In-Silico Clinical Trials for Medical Devices: A Systematic Review.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Pooled it
- From trade-offs to translation: An interdisciplinary roadmap for neurotechnology.Science advances · 2026Review
- Toward hybrid mental health care: an early health technology assessment based on stakeholder analysis and economic simulations.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026Article
- Biohybrid cochlear implants: neural interfaces, regenerative pathways, and translational benchmarks.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Review
- Mapping the evidence supporting FDA-authorized digital therapeutics, before and after authorization.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- How microrobots should be translated: A clinical and value-centered readiness framework.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- The Role of AI in Clinical Trial Design and Scientific Writing.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Review
- Dental, Oral and Craniofacial Tissue Regeneration Consortium (DOCTRC): An infrastructure for accelerating regenerative therapies from discovery to clinical impact.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Building and Sustaining Open-Source Medical Device Projects.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Review
- From bench to bedside and back: translational cardiovascular interventions in veterinary medicine.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Review
- Applying early health technology assessment (e-HTA) to inform investment in novel health technologies in the US.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Disclosed Industry Funding Does Not Increase Positive Outcomes in Studies on Suture Button Fixation for Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Assessing the Value of Further Investment in R&D Using Mixed Methods: A Case Study of Biosensor-Integrated Arteriovenous Grafts.Journal of market access & health policy · 2025Article
- Perspective: Challenges for Personalized Nutrition in the Current United States Regulatory Framework and Future Opportunities.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Large simple randomized controlled trials-from drugs to medical devices: lessons from recent experience.Trials · 2025Review
- A Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Medical Device Recall by the Food and Drug Administration.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Wireless skin sensors for electrocardiogram and heart rate monitoring in the neonatal intensive care unit: a prospective feasibility, safety, and accuracy study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Probing the limits and capabilities of diffusion models for the anatomic editing of digital twins.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The US medical device market is the world's largest, but estimates of the cost to bring a medical device to market are not available to help inform policy making and regulatory efforts to enhance device safety and innovation. Objective: To estimate the mean expected capitalized cost of developing a novel therapeutic complex medical device. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this economic evaluation, an analytical model of novel therapeutic complex medical device development using data from public and proprietary sources with coverage from 2000 through 2018 was used to estimate the cost, duration, and phase transition success probability associated with each stage of development. Data analysis was completed in September 2021. Exposures: Conduct of nonclinical and clinical studies; payment of FDA user fees for novel therapeutic complex medical devices. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean development cost (in 2018 US dollars) incurred by developers for an FDA-approved novel therapeutic complex medical device, accounting for failures and cost of capital. Results: In this economic analysis, the mean development cost for a novel therapeutic complex medical device was $54 million (95% CI, $25 million-$200 million) excluding any postapproval studies that might be required. After accounting for the cost of failed studies and cost of capital, the mean capitalized cost of bringing a novel therapeutic complex medical device to the US market was $522 million (95% CI, $205 million-$3382 million). The key factors associated with this cost were the phase transition probabilities: 46.9% for nonclinical to feasibility study, 48.0% for feasibility to pivotal study, 75.7% pivotal study to FDA premarket approval submission, and 80.5% for FDA premarket approval submission to approval. The nonclinical development stage constituted the largest portion of overall cost at 85.0% with the FDA review stage with the highest phase transition probability accounting for only a small fraction at 0.5%. Conclusions and Relevance: In this economic evaluation study, the cost of therapeutic complex medical device development from proof of concept through postapproval stages was assessed accounting for the cost of failures and the cost of capital. Existing estimates did not account for all stages of development, capitalization, or failure costs, which this study suggests were substantial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.