ArticleJAMA dermatology2022
Effect of Different Itraconazole Dosing Regimens on Cure Rates, Treatment Duration, Safety, and Relapse Rates in Adult Patients With Tinea Corporis/Cruris: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07675239 (Comparison of Itraconazole With Itraconazole and Isotretinoin in the Treatment Duration, Safety, and Cure Rate in Adult Patients With Tinea Corporis/Cruris), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Itraconazole With Itraconazole and Isotretinoin in the Treatment Duration, Safety, and Cure Rate in Adult Patients With Tinea Corporis/Cruris: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping the Global Spread of T. indotineae: An Update on Antifungal Resistance, Mutations, and Strategies for Effective Management.Mycopathologia · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of Super-Bioavailable Itraconazole and Conventional Itraconazole at Different Dosing Regimens in Glabrous Tinea Infection - A Randomized Clinical Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2023Trial
- Trichophyton indotineae: Rise, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Directions.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Clinical description and management of two terbinafine-resistant cases of tinea caused bySkin health and disease · 2026Article
- The emergence of superficial dermatophytosis due toJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparison of gradient concentration strip and EUCAST methods for itraconazole and posaconazole MICs inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Hepatobiliary disorders associated with triazole antifungal agents: a disproportionality and Bayesian analysis based on the FAERS database.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- Global Emergence ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Shifting etiological agents of dermatophytosis: a molecular epidemiological study from Iran.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Treatment and diagnostic challenges associated with the novel and rapidly emerging antifungal-resistant dermatophyte,Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Review
- Terbinafine Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Rise of Antifungal-Resistant Dermatophyte Infections: What Dermatologists Need to Know.Cutis · 2025Review
- Article
- Recognition of Antifungal-Resistant Dermatophytosis by Infectious Diseases Specialists, United States.Emerging infectious diseases · 2024Article
- The Brief Case: A case of tinea corporis caused by drug-resistantJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024Review
- Refractory tinea corporis or cruris caused byCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024Article
- Bioinformatics-Driven mRNA-Based Vaccine Design for Controlling Tinea Cruris Induced byPharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Catalase Deactivation Increases Dermatophyte Sensitivity to ROS Sources.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: With worldwide emergence of recalcitrant and resistant dermatophytosis, itraconazole is increasingly being used as the first-line drug for treatment of tinea corporis/cruris (TCC). Apparent inadequacy with low doses has led to empirical use of higher doses and antifungal combinations. Objective: To compare cure rates, treatment durations, safety profiles, and relapse rates of itraconazole 100, 200, and 400 mg/d for the treatment of TCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind randomized clinical trial included adult patients with treatment-naive TCC involving at least 5% body surface area. Patients were recruited from the dermatology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India between March 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomized to 1 of the 3 treatment groups. Biweekly blinded assessments were performed until cure or treatment failure. Posttreatment follow-up of at least 8 weeks was conducted to detect relapses. Main Outcome and Measures: Cure rates, treatment durations, safety profiles, and relapse rates were assessed. Secondary outcomes included comparison of rapidity of clinical response and cost-effectiveness between groups. Results: Of the 149 patients assessed, the mean (SD) age was 34.3 (12.2) years, 69 patients (46.4%) were women, and 80 patients (53.6%) were men. The difference in cure rate between the 100- and 200-mg groups was statistically nonsignificant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; 95% CI, 0.91-2.30; P = .12), while the difference between the 100- and 400-mg groups (HR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.78-4.62; P < .001) and between the 200- and 400-mg groups (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.28-3.09; P = .002) was statistically significant. Mean (SD) treatment durations were statistically significantly different between the 100- and 400-mg groups (7.7 [4.7] weeks vs 5.2 [2.6] weeks; P = .03) and between the 200- and 400-mg groups (7.2 [3.8] weeks vs 5.2 [2.6] weeks; P = .004), but the difference between the 100- and 200-mg groups was not statistically significant. A total of 55 patients (47.4%) relapsed after treatment. Relapse rates were comparable across groups. No patient discontinued treatment due to adverse effects. Treatment with the 200-mg dose incurred a 63% higher cost and 400 mg a 120% higher cost over 100 mg in achieving cure. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, high overall efficacy was observed among the 3 itraconazole doses for treatment of TCC, but with prolonged treatment durations and considerable relapse rates. Treatment with the 200- and 100-mg doses did not differ significantly in efficacy or treatment durations, while 400 mg scored over the other 2 on these outcomes. Considerable additional cost is incurred in achieving cure with the 200- and 400-mg doses. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry of India Identifier: CTRI/2020/03/024326.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.