Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36103158›Full record

ArticleJAMA dermatology2022

Effect of Different Itraconazole Dosing Regimens on Cure Rates, Treatment Duration, Safety, and Relapse Rates in Adult Patients With Tinea Corporis/Cruris: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ananta Khurana, Aastha Agarwal, Diksha Agrawal, Sanjeet Panesar, Manik Ghadlinge, Kabir Sardana, Khushboo Sethia, Shalini Malhotra, Ankit Chauhan, Nirmala Mehta

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07675239 (Comparison of Itraconazole With Itraconazole and Isotretinoin in the Treatment Duration, Safety, and Cure Rate in Adult Patients With Tinea Corporis/Cruris), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07675239 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Itraconazole With Itraconazole and Isotretinoin in the Treatment Duration, Safety, and Cure Rate in Adult Patients With Tinea Corporis/Cruris: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorPak Emirates Military HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsTinea CorporisArmsItraconazole (200 mg), ISOtretinoin 20 MG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The emergence of superficial dermatophytosis due toJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Global Emergence ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Terbinafine Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Refractory tinea corporis or cruris caused byCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ananta KhuranaDepartment of Dermatology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Aastha AgarwalDepartment of Dermatology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Diksha AgrawalDepartment of Dermatology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sanjeet PanesarDepartment of Community Medicine, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Manik GhadlingeDepartment of Pharmacology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Kabir SardanaDepartment of Dermatology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Khushboo SethiaDepartment of Dermatology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Shalini MalhotraDepartment of Microbiology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ankit ChauhanDepartment of Microbiology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Nirmala MehtaDepartment of Microbiology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: With worldwide emergence of recalcitrant and resistant dermatophytosis, itraconazole is increasingly being used as the first-line drug for treatment of tinea corporis/cruris (TCC). Apparent inadequacy with low doses has led to empirical use of higher doses and antifungal combinations. Objective: To compare cure rates, treatment durations, safety profiles, and relapse rates of itraconazole 100, 200, and 400 mg/d for the treatment of TCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind randomized clinical trial included adult patients with treatment-naive TCC involving at least 5% body surface area. Patients were recruited from the dermatology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India between March 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomized to 1 of the 3 treatment groups. Biweekly blinded assessments were performed until cure or treatment failure. Posttreatment follow-up of at least 8 weeks was conducted to detect relapses. Main Outcome and Measures: Cure rates, treatment durations, safety profiles, and relapse rates were assessed. Secondary outcomes included comparison of rapidity of clinical response and cost-effectiveness between groups. Results: Of the 149 patients assessed, the mean (SD) age was 34.3 (12.2) years, 69 patients (46.4%) were women, and 80 patients (53.6%) were men. The difference in cure rate between the 100- and 200-mg groups was statistically nonsignificant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; 95% CI, 0.91-2.30; P = .12), while the difference between the 100- and 400-mg groups (HR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.78-4.62; P < .001) and between the 200- and 400-mg groups (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.28-3.09; P = .002) was statistically significant. Mean (SD) treatment durations were statistically significantly different between the 100- and 400-mg groups (7.7 [4.7] weeks vs 5.2 [2.6] weeks; P = .03) and between the 200- and 400-mg groups (7.2 [3.8] weeks vs 5.2 [2.6] weeks; P = .004), but the difference between the 100- and 200-mg groups was not statistically significant. A total of 55 patients (47.4%) relapsed after treatment. Relapse rates were comparable across groups. No patient discontinued treatment due to adverse effects. Treatment with the 200-mg dose incurred a 63% higher cost and 400 mg a 120% higher cost over 100 mg in achieving cure. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, high overall efficacy was observed among the 3 itraconazole doses for treatment of TCC, but with prolonged treatment durations and considerable relapse rates. Treatment with the 200- and 100-mg doses did not differ significantly in efficacy or treatment durations, while 400 mg scored over the other 2 on these outcomes. Considerable additional cost is incurred in achieving cure with the 200- and 400-mg doses. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry of India Identifier: CTRI/2020/03/024326.

Identifiers

PMID36103158
PMCPMC9475442
OpenAlexW4295681901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.