ArticleClinical hematology international2022
FIRE Study: Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Ibrutinib in Clinical Practice in Patients with CLL and MCL.
Article in Clinical hematology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03425591 (A Retro-Prospective Observational Study of Ibrutinib Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Mantle-cell Lymphoma in Routine Clinical Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Retro-Prospective Observational Study of Ibrutinib Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Mantle-cell Lymphoma in Routine Clinical Practice
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Efficacy of BTK Inhibitors in Treatment-Naïve and Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Real-world toxicity and discontinuation risk in ibrutinib therapy: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Practical Management of Cardiovascular Adverse Events with BTKi Treatment in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Consensus Report by Hematologists and Cardiologists.Acta haematologica · 2026Review
- Article
- Final results on effectiveness and safety of Ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia from the non-interventional FIRE study.Annals of hematology · 2025Observational
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The FIRE study investigated the real-world effectiveness and safety of ibrutinib in prospectively observed patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in France. Patients were mostly relapsed/refractory with high-risk features. First-line CLL/SLL patients had del17p and/or TP53 mutations. In this interim analysis, the median follow-up time for patients with CLL/SLL and MCL was 17.7 and 15.1 months, respectively. In the effectiveness populations for CLL/SLL (n = 200) and MCL (n = 59), the median progression-free survival was not estimable and 12.4 months, respectively; the 12-month overall survival rates were 88.5% and 65.8%, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events of interest for patients with CLL/SLL (n = 202) and MCL (n = 59) included: infections and infestations (53.5% and 32.2%), major bleeding (5.0% and 5.1%), and atrial fibrillation (5.9% and 8.5%); 135 (66.8%) and 20 (33.9%) patients were continuing treatment at the time of data cutoff. Future analyses will report on longer-term follow-up (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03425591. Registered 1 February 2018-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03425591 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.