Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36103036›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular translational research2023

Harnessing Electronic Medical Records in Cardiovascular Clinical Practice and Research.

Pishoy Gouda, Justin Ezekowitz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Statin Use and Hyperglycemia: Do Statins Cause Diabetes?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pishoy GoudaDivision of Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Justin EzekowitzDivision of Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. jae2@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2724-4086

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of electronic medical records has rapidly been adopted world-wide, which has resulted in multiple new opportunities for cardiovascular research. These include the following: (1) the development and assessment of clinical decision tools, meant to increase quality of care; (2) harnessing data linkages to examine genetic, epidemiological, and pharmacological associations on an unprecedented scale; and (3) harnessing electronic medical records to facilitate the conduct of cardiovascular clinical trials. While these opportunities promise to revolutionize cardiovascular care and research, enthusiasm should be tempered while further assessment of true clinical utility has been undertaken.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesElectronic Health RecordsBiomedical ResearchArtificial intelligenceCardiovascular researchElectronic health recordElectronic medical recordMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID36103036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.