Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36103000›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2022

Surgical results of 158 petroclival meningiomas with special focus on standard craniotomies.

Gabriele Schackert, Miriam Lenk, Matthias Kirsch, Silke Hennig, Dirk Daubner, Kay Engellandt, Steffen Appold, Dino Podlesek, Sahr Sandi-Gahun, Tareq A Juratli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Microanatomical Investigation of the Subtemporal Transtentorial Approach].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabriele SchackertDepartment of Neurosurgery, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Miriam LenkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Matthias KirschDepartment of Neurosurgery, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Silke HennigDepartment of Neurosurgery, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Dirk DaubnerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Kay EngellandtInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Steffen AppoldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Dino PodlesekDepartment of Neurosurgery, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Sahr Sandi-GahunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Tareq A JuratliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2236-6719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this retrospective study is the evaluation of risk factors for postoperative neurological deficits after petroclival meningioma (PCM) surgery with special focus on standard craniotomies. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne-hundred-fifty-eight patients were included in the study, of which 133 patients suffered from primary and 25 from recurrent PCM. All patients were operated on and evaluated concerning age, tumor size, histology, pre- and postoperative cranial nerve (CN) deficits, morbidity, mortality, and surgical complications. Tumor-specific features-e.g., consistency, surface, arachnoid cleavage, and location-were set in a four-grade classification system that was used to evaluate the risk of CN deficits and tumor resectability.

resultsAfter primary tumor resection, new CN deficits occurred in 27.3% of patients. Preoperative ataxia improved in 25%, whereas 10% developed new ataxia. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 59.4%. The morbidity rate, including hemiparesis, shunt-dependence, postop-hemorrhage, and tracheostomy was 22.6% and the mortality rate was 2.3%. In recurrent PCM surgery, CN deficits occurred in 16%. GTR could be achieved in three cases. Minor complications occurred in 20%. By applying the proposed new classification system to patients operated via standard craniotomies, the best outcome was observed in type I tumor patients (soft tumor consistency, smooth surface, plane arachnoid cleavage, and unilateral localization) with GTR in 78.7% (p < 0.001) and 11.9% new CN deficits (p = 0.006).

conclusionStandard craniotomies as the retrosigmoid or subtemporal/pterional approaches are often used for the resection of PCMs. Whether these approaches are sufficient for GTR-and avoidance of new neurological deficits-depends mainly on the localization and intrinsic tumor-specific features.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaSkull Base NeoplasmsAtaxiaCraniotomyHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeurosurgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeClassificationComplicationsIntraoperative tumor featuresMeningiomaPetroclivalPterional approachRetrosigmoid and subtemporal

Identifiers

PMID36103000
PMCPMC9622548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.