Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36102993›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2023

Incidence of surgical site infections after cervical spine surgery: results of a single-center cohort study adhering to multimodal preventive wound control protocol.

Vera Spatenkova, Ondrej Bradac, Zuzana Mareckova, Petr Suchomel, Jan Hradil, Eduard Kuriscak, Milada Halacova

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Wound Microbiota and Its Impact on Wound Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vera SpatenkovaNeurocenter, Neurointensive Care Unit, Regional Hospital, Husova 357/10, 46063, Liberec, Czech Republic. vera.spatenkova@nemlib.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-0967
Ondrej BradacDepartment of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84/1, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic.
Zuzana MareckovaNeurocenter, Department of Neurosurgery, Regional Hospital, Husova 357/10, 46063, Liberec, Czech Republic.
Petr SuchomelFaculty of Health Studies, Technical University of Liberec, Studentská 1402/2, 461 17, Liberec 1, Czech Republic.
Jan HradilNeurocenter, Department of Neurosurgery, Regional Hospital, Husova 357/10, 46063, Liberec, Czech Republic.
Eduard KuriscakInstitute of Physiology, First Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 5, 12800, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Milada HalacovaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 37/2, 150 30, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZKrajská Nemocnice Liberec · CZTechnical University of Liberec · CZNa Homolce Hospital · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe incidence of surgical site infections is considered a relevant indicator of perioperative and postoperative care quality. The aim of this study is to analyze and evaluate SSIs after elective cervical spine surgery under the guidance of our preventive multimodal wound protocol.

methodsA monocentric observational cohort study analyzed 797 patients who underwent cervical spine surgery from 2005 to 2010 (mean age 51.58 ± 11.74 year, male 56.09%, mean BMI 26.87 ± 4.41, ASA score 1-2 in 81.68% of patients), fulfilling the entry criteria: (1) cervical spine surgery performed by neurosurgeons (degenerative disease 85.19%, trauma 11.04%, tumor 3.76%), (2) elective surgery, (3) postoperative care in our neurointensive care unit. Our preventive wound control protocol management focused mainly on antibiotic prophylaxis, wound hygiene regime, and drainage equipment. All wound complications and surgical site infections were monitored up for 1 year after surgery.

resultsWe had only 2 (0.25%) patients with SSI after cervical spine surgery-one organ/space infection (osteomyelitis, primary due to liquorrhea) after anterior surgical approach, and one deep surgical site infection (due to dehiscence) after posterior approach. We had 17 (2.13%) patients with some wound complications (secretion 7, dehiscence 4, hematoma 1, edema 3, and liquorrhea 2) that were not classified as SSI according to the CDC guidelines.

conclusionConcerning our study population of patients undergoing elective cervical surgery, with ASA scores 1-2 in 81.68% of our patients, the incidence of SSI was 0.14% after anterior surgical approach, 1.4% after posterior surgical approach, and 0.25% altogether in the referred cohort.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeSurgical Wound InfectionAdultCohort StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntibiotic prophylaxisIncidence of SSIPreventive infection protocolSurgical site infectionWound complications

Identifiers

PMID36102993
PMCPMC10276122
OpenAlexW4295755449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.