Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36102818›Full record

SynthesisRheumatology (Oxford, England)2023

Comparative effectiveness of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: updates to a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.

Philip J Mease, Iain B McInnes, Lai-Shan Tam, Raji Rajalingam, Steve Peterson, Fareen Hassan, Soumya D Chakravarty, Christine Contré, Alison Armstrong, Wolf-Henning Boehncke and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Philip J MeaseRheumatology Research, Swedish Medical Center/Providence St Joseph Health and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6620-0457
Iain B McInnesInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Lai-Shan TamDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong and The Prince of Wales Hospital, Sha Tin, New Territories, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-6410-8852
Raji RajalingamEVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Steve PetersonJanssen Global Services, Horsham, PA, USA.
Fareen HassanJanssen EMEA, High Wycombe, UK.
Soumya D ChakravartyJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA.
Christine ContréJanssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson and Johnson, Issy-les-Moulneaux, France.
Alison ArmstrongEVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Wolf-Henning BoehnckeDivision of Dermatology and Venereology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christopher RitchlinDepartment of Medicine - Allergy/Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
EVERSANA (Canada) · CAJanssen (United States) · USChinese University of Hong Kong · HKJanssen (France) · FRJanssen (United Kingdom) · GBProvidence College · USUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe IL-23 p19-subunit inhibitor guselkumab has been previously compared with other targeted therapies for PsA through network meta-analysis (NMA). The objective of this NMA update was to include new guselkumab COSMOS trial data, and two key comparators: the IL-23 inhibitor risankizumab and the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor upadacitinib. MATERIAL AND

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials up to February 2021. A hand-search identified newer agents up to July 2021. Bayesian NMAs were performed to compare treatments on ACR response, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response, modified van der Heijde-Sharp (vdH-S) score, and serious adverse events (SAEs).

resultsFor ACR 20, guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W) and every 4 weeks (Q4W) were comparable (i.e. overlap in credible intervals) to most other agents, including risankizumab, upadacitinib, subcutaneous TNF inhibitors and most IL-17A inhibitors. For PASI 90, guselkumab Q8W and Q4W were better than multiple agents, including subcutaneous TNF and JAK inhibitors. For vdH-S, guselkumab Q8W was similar to risankizumab, while guselkumab Q4W was better; both doses were comparable to most other agents. Most agents had comparable SAEs.

conclusionsGuselkumab demonstrates better skin efficacy than most other targeted PsA therapies, including upadacitinib. For vdH-S, both guselkumab doses are comparable to most treatments, with both doses ranking higher than most, including upadacitinib and risankizumab. Both guselkumab doses demonstrate comparable ACR responses to most other agents, including upadacitinib and risankizumab, and rank favourably in the network for SAEs.

Indexed as

Arthritis, PsoriaticPsoriasisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBayes TheoremHumansSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedguselkumabACR responseComparative effectiveness researchguselkumabmodified van der Heijde–Sharp (vdH-S) scorenetwork meta-analysisPsAPsoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responseserious adverse eventssystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID36102818
PMCPMC10070072
OpenAlexW4295681724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.