Observational studyThe lancet. Healthy longevity2022
Counting the cost of premature mortality with progressively worse aortic stenosis in Australia: a clinical cohort study.
Observational study in The lancet. Healthy longevity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Moderate Aortic Valve Stenosis Is Associated With Increased Mortality Rate and Lifetime Loss: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data of 409 680 Patients.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Lipoprotein(a) and Aortic Stenosis: From Genetic Risk to Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.European cardiology · 2026Review
- Benefits of Better Cardiovascular Health for Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis Stratified by Polygenic Risk Score.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of population screening for aortic stenosis.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Article
- Article
- Incidence and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement:Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2025Article
- Rare Earth Elements in Human Calcified Aortic Valves and Epicardial Adipose Tissue.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A Narrative Review of the Evidence for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implants.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- The influence of lipoprotein(a) on aortic valve calcification in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Article
- 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Detection of severe aortic stenosis by clinicians versus artificial intelligence: A retrospective clinical cohort study.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- An Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Detection of Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Clinical Cohort Study.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Aortic Valve Calcium Score: Applications in Clinical Practice and Scientific Research-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Clinical Outcomes after Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in 681 Octogenarians: A Single-Center Real-World Experience Comparing the Old Patients with the Very Old Patients.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- 2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- Aortic Valve Embryology, Mechanobiology, and Second Messenger Pathways: Implications for Clinical Practice.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Classification of Aortic Stenosis Patients via ECG-Independent Multi-Site Measurements of Cardiac-Induced Accelerations and Angular Velocities at the Skin Level.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAortic stenosis is the most common cardiac valve disorder requiring clinical management. However, there is little evidence on the societal cost of progressive aortic stenosis. We sought to quantify the societal burden of premature mortality associated with progressively worse aortic stenosis.
methodsIn this observational clinical cohort study, we examined echocardiograms on native aortic valves of 98 565 men and 99 357 women aged 65 years or older across 23 sites in Australia, from Jan 1, 2003, to Dec 31, 2017. Individuals were grouped according to their peak aortic valve velocity in 0·50 m/s increments up to 4·00 m/s or more (severe aortic stenosis), using 1·00-1·99 m/s (no aortic stenosis) as the reference group. Sex-specific premature mortality and years of life lost during a 5-year follow-up were calculated, along with willingness-to-pay to regain quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
findingsOverall, 20 701 (21·0%) men and 18 576 (18·7%) women had evidence of mild-to-severe aortic stenosis. The actual 5-year mortality in men with normal aortic valves was 32·1% and in women was 26·1%, increasing to 40·9% (mild aortic stenosis) and 52·2% (severe aortic stenosis) in men and to 35·9% (mild aortic stenosis) and 55·3% (severe aortic stenosis) in women. Overall, the estimated societal cost of premature mortality associated with aortic stenosis was AU$629 million in men and $735 million in women. Per 1000 men and women investigated, aortic stenosis was associated with eight more premature deaths in men resulting in 32·5 more QALYs lost (societal cost of $1·40 million) and 12 more premature deaths in women resulting in 57·5 more QALYs lost (societal cost of $2·48 million) when compared with those without aortic stenosis.
interpretationAny degree of aortic stenosis in older individuals is associated with premature mortality and QALYs. In this context, there is a crucial need for cost-effective strategies to promptly detect and optimally manage this common condition within our ageing populations.
fundingEdwards LifeSciences, National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.