Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36102619›Full record

ArticleFEBS open bio2023

A mouse model of lung cancer induced via intranasal injection for anticancer drug screening and evaluation of pathology.

Ryo Tanaka, Shosei Yoshinouchi, Kento Karouji, Yuki Tanaka, Tsukasa Tominari, Michiko Hirata, Chiho Matsumoto, Yoshifumi Itoh, Chisato Miyaura, Masaki Inada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS open bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vismodegib-loaded ufasomes inhaler for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ryo TanakaCooperative Major of Advanced Health Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan.
Shosei YoshinouchiCooperative Major of Advanced Health Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan.
Kento KaroujiDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan.
Yuki TanakaDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan.
Tsukasa TominariDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5683-8951
Michiko HirataDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan.
Chiho MatsumotoDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan.
Yoshifumi ItohInstitute of Global Innovation Research, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2128-2823
Chisato MiyauraCooperative Major of Advanced Health Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan.
Masaki InadaCooperative Major of Advanced Health Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5066-8506
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology · JPCentral Research Laboratories (United Kingdom) · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathologies and lethality of lung cancers are associated with smoking, lifestyle, and genomic factors. Several experimental mouse models of lung cancer, including those induced via intrapulmonary injection and intratracheal injection, have been reported for evaluating the pharmacological effect of drugs. However, these models are not sufficient for evaluating the efficacy of drugs during screening, as these direct injection models ignore the native processes of cancer progression in vivo, resulting in the inadequate pathological formation of lung cancer. In the present study, we developed a novel intranasal injection model of lung cancer simulating the native lung cancer pathology for anticancer drug screening. A mouse lung cancer cell line (Lewis lung carcinoma; LCC) was intranasally injected into mouse lungs, and injected cell number-dependent cancer proliferation was apparent in both the left and right lungs. Human non-small-cell lung cancer (NCI-H460) cells were also intranasally injected into nude mice and similarly showed injected cell number-dependent cancer growth. For the pharmacological evaluation of cisplatin, two different treatment frequencies were tested four times per month and twice a month. The intranasal injection model confirmed that cisplatin suppressed lung cancer progression to a greater extent under the more frequent treatment condition. In conclusion, these results indicated that our intranasal injection model is a powerful tool for investigating lung cancer pathology and may aid in the development of new anti-lung cancer agents.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAnimalsCisplatinEarly Detection of CancerHumansMiceMice, NudeAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinanticancer drug screeningcisplatinintranasal injectionlewis lung carcinomaNCI-H460orthotopic lung cancer model

Identifiers

PMID36102619
PMCPMC9810119
OpenAlexW4295759461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.