Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36102406›Full record

ArticleRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2022

Comparison of mortality and survival without major morbidities of very preterm infants with very low birth weight from Japan and Brazil.

Caroline Kaori Tomo, Olukunmi Omobolanle Balogun, Josy Davidson, Ruth Guinsburg, Maria Fernanda Branco de Almeida, José Maria de Andrade Lopes, Marina Carvalho de Moraes Barros, Kenji Takehara, Masashi Mikami, Tetsuya Isayama and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline Kaori TomoUniversity of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0071-6095
Olukunmi Omobolanle BalogunNational Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1684-3446
Josy DavidsonUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4004-1889
Ruth GuinsburgUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-9861
Maria Fernanda Branco de AlmeidaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5864-3808
José Maria de Andrade LopesUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2356-4656
Marina Carvalho de Moraes BarrosUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6989-3474
Kenji TakeharaNational Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5957-600X
Masashi MikamiNational Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-824X
Tetsuya IsayamaNational Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3669-883X
Ai HoshinoUniversity of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0287-525X
Rintaro MoriKyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7656-6156
Masashi MizuguchiUniversity of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-6221
National Center For Child Health and Development · JPUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRThe University of Tokyo · JPKyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was carried out to understand the disparities in mortality and survival without major morbidities among very premature and very low birth weight infants between participating Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) from the Brazilian Network on Neonatal Research (RBPN) and the Neonatal Research Network of Japan (NRNJ).

methodsSecondary data analysis of surveys by the RBPN and NRNJ was performed. The surveys were conducted in 2014 and 2015 and included 187 NICUs. Primary outcome was mortality or survival without any major morbidity. Logistic regression analysis adjustment for confounding factors was used.

resultsThe study population consisted of 6,406 infants from the NRNJ and 2,319 from the RBPN. Controlling for various confounders, infants from RBPN had 9.06 times higher adjusted odds of mortality (95%CI 7.30-11.29), and lower odds of survival without major morbidities (AOR 0.36; 95%CI 0.32-0.41) compared with those from the NRNJ. Factors associated with higher odds of mortality among Brazilian NICUs included: Air Leak Syndrome (AOR 4.73; 95%CI 1.26-15.27), Necrotizing Enterocolitis (AOR 3.25; 95%CI 1.38-7.26), and Late Onset Sepsis (LOS) (AOR 4.86; 95%CI 2.25-10.97).

conclusionsVery premature and very low birth weight infants from Brazil had significantly higher odds for mortality and lower odds for survival without major morbidities in comparison to those from Japan. Additionally, we identified the factors that increased the odds of in-hospital neonatal death in Brazil, most of which was related to LOS.

Indexed as

Infant, Premature, DiseasesPremature BirthSepsisBrazilFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightJapanMorbidity

Identifiers

PMID36102406
PMCPMC9462411
OpenAlexW4295046070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.