Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36102340›Full record

ArticleWorldviews on evidence-based nursing2022

Evidence, expertise, and patient/family preferences to maximize health for older adults with implications for evidence-based practice.

Inga M Zadvinskis, Sharon Tucker, Jacqueline Hoying

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Inga M ZadvinskisHelene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9504-1056
Sharon TuckerHelene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4217-1559
Jacqueline HoyingHelene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3034-6972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs Americans live longer and with chronic conditions, the healthcare system, researchers, faculty, practicing providers, patients, and families must adapt to changing societal needs and goals.

aimsThe aim of this commentary was to offer recommendations that align with the six vital directions to improve the health care and quality of life for older Americans.

methodsThis article expands upon the six vital directions from an evidence-based practice (EBP) perspective that values the three legs of the EBP stool: (1) research evidence, (2) clinician expertise, and (3) patient preferences, values, and circumstances.

resultsThe recommendations reflect the scientific literature, our expertise in EBP and research, our nursing roles and expertise, and our experiences in the care of our older parents. By sharing our experiences as nurse scientists and daughters, we offer insight to raise the healthcare bar for older adults through EBP and meaningful, person-centered care. LINKING ACTION TO EVIDENCE: Vital directions for improving the health care and quality of life for older Americans include promoting interprofessional education to create an adequately prepared workforce; researching and implementing pathways to minimize the social determinants of health for older adults; disseminating findings that remediate older adult health disparities; innovating approaches for managing chronic health conditions at home; and studying and implementing approaches for allocating resources for end-of-life care that are satisfying for the patients, their family, and clinicians.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTerminal CareAgedDelivery of Health CareEvidence-Based PracticeHumansPatient PreferenceUnited Statescase studies/case reportevidence-based practicegerontology/geriatricsnursing practicepatient outcomespatient outcomes/healthcare outcomes/treatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID36102340
PMCPMC9826038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.