Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36102261›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Rates of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in England and Wales: Impact of COURAGE and ORBITA Trials.

Muhammad Rashid, Chris Stevens, Harindra C Wijeysundera, Nick Curzen, Chee Wah Khoo, Mohamed Osama Mohamed, Suleman Aktaa, Jianhua Wu, Peter F Ludman, Mamas A Mamas

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad RashidKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, School of Medicine, Keele University Stoke-on-Trent UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9725-1583
Chris StevensKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, School of Medicine, Keele University Stoke-on-Trent UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9203-8062
Harindra C WijeysunderaInstitute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto Ontario.ORCID 0000-0001-8464-1080
Nick CurzenFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton & Department of Cardiology University Hospital NHS Trust Southampton UK.
Chee Wah KhooDepartment of Academic Cardiology Royal Stoke University Hospital Stoke-on-Trent UK.
Mohamed Osama MohamedKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, School of Medicine, Keele University Stoke-on-Trent UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9678-5222
Suleman AktaaLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine Leeds UK.
Jianhua WuLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine Leeds UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6093-599X
Peter F LudmanDepartment of Cardiology Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham UK.
Mamas A MamasKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, School of Medicine, Keele University Stoke-on-Trent UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9241-8890
Royal Stoke University Hospital · GBKeele University · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background There are limited data about how COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) and ORBITA (Objective Randomized Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina) trials have impacted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practices at regional or national level. We evaluated temporal trends in elective PCI rates for stable angina and, specifically, examined the impact of the COURAGE and ORBITA trials on PCI practices in England and Wales. Methods and Results We used national PCI data comprising >1.2 million patients undergoing PCI between January 2006 and December 2019. Patient demographics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were analyzed, and temporal trends in PCI rates for stable angina were compared before and after the publication of the COURAGE and ORBITA trials. Of 1 245 802 PCI procedures, 430 248 (34.5%) were performed for stable angina. Over the study period, the number of elective PCI procedures per year (30 823 in 2006 to 34 103 in 2019) and per 100 000 population estimates (50.7 in 2006 to 58.4 in 2019) remained stable. The proportion of patients undergoing elective PCI without angina symptoms almost doubled from 5.1% to 9.7%. The incidence rate of elective PCI volume after the COURAGE trial, published in 2007, was not different from before the trial was published (incidence rate ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.69-1.62]). It also remained stable after the publication of the ORBITA trial in 2017 (incidence rate ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.74-1.23]). Conclusions In this nationwide analysis, rates of elective PCI for stable angina remained stable over 14 years. Publication of the COURAGE and ORBITA trials had no impact on elective PCI activity.

Indexed as

Angina, StableCouragePercutaneous Coronary InterventionElective Surgical ProceduresHumansWalesangina, stableCOURAGEEnglandinsulin receptor‐related receptorpercutaneous coronary interventionWales

Identifiers

PMID36102261
PMCPMC9683655
OpenAlexW4295563993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.