Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36102191›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2022

Nectar resources affect bird-dispersed microbial metacommunities in suburban and rural gardens.

Marion L Donald, Josie A Galbraith, Daria A Erastova, Anastasija Podolyan, Tom E X Miller, Manpreet K Dhami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marion L DonaldDepartment of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9077-8411
Josie A GalbraithDepartment of Natural Sciences, Auckland Museum, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-7977
Daria A ErastovaSchool of Biological Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1947-2123
Anastasija PodolyanBiocontrol & Molecular Ecology, Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8332-2683
Tom E X MillerProgram in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3208-6067
Manpreet K DhamiBiocontrol & Molecular Ecology, Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8956-0674

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As cities expand, understanding how urbanization affects biodiversity is a key ecological goal. Yet, little is known about how host-associated microbial diversity responds to urbanization. We asked whether communities of microbial (bacterial and fungal) in floral nectar and sugar-water feeders and vectored by nectar-feeding birds-thus forming a metacommunity-differed in composition and diversity between suburban and rural gardens. Compared to rural birds, we found that suburban birds vectored different and more diverse bacterial communities. These differences were not detected in the nectar of common plant species, suggesting that nectar filters microbial taxa and results in metacommunity convergence. However, when considering all the nectar sources present, suburban beta diversity was elevated compared to rural beta diversity due to turnover of bacterial taxa across a plant species and sugar-water feeders. While fungal metacommunity composition and beta diversity in nectar were similar between suburban and rural sites, alpha diversity was elevated in suburban sites, which mirrored the trend of increased fungal alpha diversity on birds. These results emphasize the interdependence of host, vector, and microbial diversity and demonstrate that human decisions can shape nectar microbial diversity in contrasting ways for bacteria and fungi.

Indexed as

GardensPlant NectarAnimalsBacteriaBiodiversityBirdsHumansPlantsSugarsWaterPlant NectarSugarsWater

Identifiers

PMID36102191
PMCPMC10087401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.