Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36102139›Full record

ArticleVox sanguinis2022

Early and out-of-hospital use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma: An international assessment of utilization and feasibility.

Arwa Z Al-Riyami, Lise Estcourt, Naomi Rahimi-Levene, Evan M Bloch, Ruchika Goel, Pierre Tiberghien, Jean-Baptiste Thibert, Mie Topholm Bruun, Dana V Devine, Richard R Gammon and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vox sanguinis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Is there any revival of the use of plasma therapy or neutralizing convalescent antibody therapy to treat SARS-CoV-2 variants and are we rethinking preparedness plans?Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 17 institutions in 16 countries.

Arwa Z Al-RiyamiDepartment of Hematology, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8649-0650
Lise EstcourtNHS Blood and Transplant & Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Naomi Rahimi-LeveneBlood Bank, Shamir Medical Centre, Assaf Harofeh MC, Zerifin, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3411-886X
Evan M BlochDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8181-9517
Ruchika GoelDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9653-9905
Pierre TiberghienEtablissement Français du Sang, Rennes, France.
Jean-Baptiste ThibertEtablissement Français du Sang, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8721-8357
Mie Topholm BruunDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Dana V DevineCentre for Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9059-0344
Richard R GammonScientific Medical and Technical Direction, OneBlood, Orlando, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-9579
Silvano WendelBlood Bank, Hospital Sírio-Libanês Blood Bank, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1941-7733
Michel Toungouz NevessignskyBelgian Red Cross, Suarlée, Namur, Belgium.
Rada M Grubovic RastvorcevaInstitute for Transfusion Medicine of RNM, Skopje, North Macedonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4885-3323
Adaeze OrehNational Blood Service Commission, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9141-8215
Iñigo RomonHematology Department, University Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Karin van den BergTransfusion Medicine and Technical Services Division, South African National Blood Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Junichi KitazawaDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan.
Gopal PatidarDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9681-3898
Cynthia So-OsmanUnit Transfusion Medicine, Sanquin Blood Bank, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4151-2865
Erica M WoodTransfusion Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
ISBT COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Working Group
Établissement Français du Sang · FRJohns Hopkins University · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INAomori Prefectural Central Hospital · JPAssaf Harofeh Medical Center · ILErasmus MC · NLFederal Ministry of Health · NGHospital Sírio-Libanês · BRInstitute of public health of Republic of Macedonia · MKMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESMonash Health · AUNHS Blood and Transplant · GBOdense University Hospital · DKOneBlood · USSultan Qaboos University Hospital · OMUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

Research training in HIV-related transfusion medicine and hematology in South AfricaD43TW010345 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI UTE JENTSCH, EDWARD L MURPHY · 2017 to 2026
$3.0M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe use of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) in the treatment of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome-2 infection has been controversial. Early administration of CCP before hospital admission offers a potential advantage. This manuscript summarizes current trials of early use of CCP and explores the feasibility of this approach in different countries. MATERIALS AND

methodsA questionnaire was distributed to the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) CCP working group. We recorded respondents' input on existing trials on early/outpatient CCP and out-of-hospital (OOH)/home transfusion (HT) practices in their countries and feedback on challenges in initiating home CCP infusion programmes. In addition, details of existing trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov were summarized.

resultsA total of 31 country representatives participated. Early/OOH CCP transfusion studies were reported in the United States, the Netherlands, Spain and Brazil. There were a total of six published and five ongoing trials on the prophylactic and therapeutic early use of CCP. HT was practised in Australia, the UK, Belgium, France, Japan, Nigeria, the Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Norway, the United States and some provinces in Canada. Thirty-four representatives indicated a lack of OOH CCP or HT in their institutions and countries. Barriers to implementation of OOH/HT included existing legislation, lack of policies pertaining to outpatient transfusion, and associated logistical challenges, including lack of staffing and resources.

conclusionEarly administration of CCP remains a potential option in COVID-19 management in countries with existing OOH/HT programmes. Legislation and regulatory bodies should consider OOH/HT practice for transfusion in future pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 SerotherapyFeasibility StudiesHospitalsHumansImmunization, PassiveSARS-CoV-2convalescent plasmaCOVID-19home transfusion

Identifiers

PMID36102139
PMCPMC9538090
OpenAlexW4295757221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.