Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36102103›Full record

ArticleThe world journal of men's health2023

Is There a Relevant Clinical Impact in Differentiating Idiopathic

Christian Corsini, Luca Boeri, Luigi Candela, Edoardo Pozzi, Federico Belladelli, Paolo Capogrosso, Giuseppe Fallara, Nicolò Schifano, Daniele Cignoli, Eugenio Ventimiglia and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The world journal of men's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Seminal FBiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christian Corsini *Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9603-1589
Luca Boeri *Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0040-784X
Luigi CandelaDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0593-8802
Edoardo PozziDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0228-7039
Federico BelladelliDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2165-659X
Paolo CapogrossoDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Ospedale di Circolo and Macchi Foundation, Varese, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2347-9504
Giuseppe FallaraDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7872-2650
Nicolò SchifanoDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-4316
Daniele CignoliDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7873-7318
Eugenio VentimigliaDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3654-1629
Alessia D'ArmaDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4855-4577
Massimo AlfanoDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6904-9158
Francesco MontorsiDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7267-4181
Andrea SaloniaDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-7165
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITOspedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOverall, male factor infertility (MFI) accounts for up to 50% of etiologies of couple's infertility, with almost 30% of MFI cases being idiopathic in nature. Idiopathic MFI does not support a tailored treatment work-up in clinical practice. To investigate rates of and characteristics of men presenting for idiopathic MATERIALS AND

methodsDemographic, clinical and laboratory data from 3,098 primary infertile men consecutively evaluated were analyzed and compared with those of 103 fertile controls. Idiopathic male infertility (IMI) was defined for abnormality at semen analysis with no previous history of diseases affecting fertility and normal findings on physical examination and genetic and laboratory testing. Unexplained male infertility (UMI) was defined as infertility of unknown origin with completely normal findings at semen analysis. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between clinical variables and idiopathic infertility status.

resultsOverall, 570 (18.5%) and 154 (5.0%) patients depicted criteria suggestive for either IMI or UMI, respectively. Groups were similar in terms of age, BMI, CCI, recreational habits, hormonal milieu, and sperm DNA fragmentation indexes. Conversely, testicular volume was lower in IMI (p<0.001). Vitamin D3 levels were lower in IMI

conclusionsCurrent findings further support the urgent need of a more detailed and comprehensive assessment of infertile men to better tailoring their management work-up in the everyday clinical setting.

Indexed as

AndrologyInfertilityInfertility etiologyTestis abnormalitiesVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID36102103
PMCPMC10042653
OpenAlexW4294663273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.