Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36101888›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric research and clinical practice2020

Psychometric Properties of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking Scale and Validation of Clinical Utility in the EMBARC Study.

Abu Minhajuddin, Manish K Jha, Cherise Chin Fatt, Madhukar H Trivedi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric research and clinical practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Association between irritability and suicidal ideation in three clinical trials of adults with major depressive disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abu MinhajuddinCenter for Depression Research and Clinical Care University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas.
Manish K JhaCenter for Depression Research and Clinical Care University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas.
Cherise Chin FattCenter for Depression Research and Clinical Care University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas.
Madhukar H TrivediCenter for Depression Research and Clinical Care University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The authors aimed to evaluate psychometric properties of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking (CAST) Scale and validate the clinical utility of measuring irritability by updating and replicating a previously published outcome calculator from the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes (CO-MED) trial. Methods: Participants were 292 adults from the Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response in Clinical Care (EMBARC) study who had completed the CAST scale at baseline. The scale's five-domain (irritability, anxiety, mania, insomnia, and panic) structure was evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis. Correlations with other clinical measures were used to confirm convergent and divergent validity. Logistic regression analyses from CO-MED were used to estimate individual outcomes in EMBARC. Results: Cronbach's alpha for the CAST scale was 0.78. Model fit for the five-domain structure was adequate (goodness of fit index=0.93, comparative fit index=0.92, root mean square error of approximation=0.06). Scores on irritability, anxiety, panic, insomnia, and mania were correlated with scores on the Anger Attack Questionnaire irritability item (r Conclusions: Measuring irritability may help predict clinical course. The CAST scale is a valid measure of depression-associated symptoms, including irritability.

Indexed as

antidepressant treatmentanxietyirritabilitymajor depressive disorderoutcome predictionprognostic tool

Identifiers

PMID36101888
PMCPMC9175787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.