Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36101770›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2022

Trends and predictors of modern contraceptive use among married women: Analysis of 2000-2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Surveys.

Wudalew Meselu, Ashenafi Habtamu, Wubetu Woyraw, Tesfa Birlew Tsegaye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wudalew MeseluWudalew Meselu Tesfaye, Associate, Health Financing Program, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ashenafi HabtamuAshenafi Habtamu, Health Services Management, Economics and Health Policy, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Assela, Ethiopia.
Wubetu WoyrawDepartment of Nutrition, College of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Tesfa Birlew TsegayeDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Accessing family planning is a key investment in reducing the broader costs of health care and can reduce a significant proportion of maternal, infant, and childhood deaths. In Ethiopia, use of modern contraceptive methods is still low but it is steadily increasing. Identifying the contributing factors to the changes in contraceptive use among women helps to improve women's contraceptive use and helps to plan strategies for family planning programs. Thus, the current study aimed to analyze the trends and predictors of changes in modern contraceptive use over time among married women in Ethiopia. Data source and study design: Secondary data analysis of the national representative data of 2000-2016 Ethiopian Demography and Health Survey was employed. Methods: This secondary data analysis was considered using 2000 through 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Surveys. The study used data from the four DHSs conducted in Ethiopia (2000-2016). The data from all EDHS was collated so as to follow the trends throughout the period considered for the survey. Married women aged 15-49 years with sample sizes of 36,721 (9,203 in 2000, 8,438 in 2005, 9,478 in 2011, and 9,602 in 2016) were included. The analysis involved three levels, including trend analysis (to see changes from 2000 to 2005, 2005-2011, 2011-2016 and 2000-2016). Bivariate and multivariate analysis were also considered to identify predictors of modern contraceptive use. Data was extracted from the EDHS datasets for which authorization was obtained from the DHS Program/ICF International using a data extraction tool. SPSS 24 was employed for data management and analysis. Results: Among married women of reproductive age, modern contraceptive prevalence increased from 6.2% in 2000 to 35.2% in 2016. This 5-fold increment in modern contraceptive use was due to being in the age group of 25-29 years (AOR = 1.4; 95%CI (1.1, 1.7)), having two children (AOR = 1.3; 95%CI (1.1, 1.6)), the richest wealth category (AOR = 3.0; 95% CI (2.5, 3.5)), currently working (AOR = 1.3; 95%CI (1.2, 1.5)) and attending secondary and above education (AOR = 1.2; 95%CI (1.1, 1.6)) were found to be predictors. Conclusions: Over the past 15 years, an annual average of a 1.9% point increment has been observed in modern contraceptive use, but the country lags behind the SDGs's 2030 target of achieving zero unmet needs for contraception. Program interventions, and continued education of women, are mandatory, as education is one of the major factors contributing to increasing contraceptive use.

Indexed as

AJO, African Journals OnlineBMC, Biomed CentralCDC, Center for disease Control and PreventionCPR, Contraceptive Prevalence RateDemographic and health surveysDHS, Demographic and Health SurveysEDHS, Ethiopian Demographic and Health SurveysEHNRI, Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research InstituteEMDHS, thiopian Mini Demographic and Health SurveysEthiopiaFMOH, Federal Ministry of HealthHIV, Human Immuno-Deficiency VirusICPD, International Conference on Population and DevelopmentIUD, Intra-uterine deviceLAM, Lactational amenorrhea methodMarried womenModern contraceptive useReproductive ageSPSS, Statistical Package for Social SciencesTrends and predictorsUNFPA, United Nations Fund for PopulationVIF, Variance Inflation Factor

Identifiers

PMID36101770
PMCPMC9461593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.