ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2022
Where can Tanzania health system integrate clinical management of patients with dual tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus? A cross-sectional survey at varying levels of health facilities.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Provision of Care for Patients with Tuberculosis and Diabetes Mellitus Multi-Morbidity in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: An Analysis of Patients' Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- From silos to synergy: assessing tuberculosis basic management units readiness for integrated diabetes mellitus care across different districts of Pakistan.Primary health care research & development · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the current Tanzania health facilities readiness in integrating clinical management of dual Tuberculosis (TB) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM) by using the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) manual of the World Health Organization prior to implementing an integrated service model. Study design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A needs assessment survey was conducted at varying levels of health care facilities. The SARA manual evaluated the service delivery outcomes in terms of availability of guidelines, medicines and diagnostic equipment, training of healthcare workers in providing TB and DM care, and patient record review. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science version 26. Results: Among 29 health facilities selected, three were regional referral hospitals, eight were district hospitals and eighteen were health centers. Baseline investigations revealed that GeneXpert MTB/RIF machines were present in 10 (34.5%) facilities, and glycated hemoglobin devices were present in two (6.9%) facilities, while all health facilities had a glucometer. The presence of an attending medical doctor in 19 (65.5%) facilities and the presence of operating biochemistry analyzers in 15 (51.7%) facilities were two mandatory variables used to assess readiness. Among the various guidelines observed, none of the facilities had the 2016 DM guidelines. Overall, 15 (51.7%) health facilities were ready to integrate dual TB and DM services. Conclusion: Integrative TB/DM screening and management activities can be achieved only if integration initiatives are prioritized at all levels of health facilities and among health policy makers in Tanzania. At least half of the health facilities were prepared to integrate the management of dual TB/DM. However, there is an urgent need to mobilize significant resources to improve the integration in these facilities, such as management guidelines and diagnostics..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.