Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36101751›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2022

Effect of three lockdowns in London: Case study for residential fires.

Sayaka Suzuki, Samuel L Manzello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sayaka SuzukiResearch & Development Division, National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster, Tokyo, Japan.
Samuel L ManzelloReax Engineering Inc., Berkeley, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The effect of lockdown periods on the number of residential fires was investigated based on three factors: the weekly change in the number of residential fires, the time of the day of residential fires, and the notional cost associated with residential fires. Study design: observational study. Methods: Analysis from Open Data Source. A new index was introduced and the weekly change during the lockdown periods was investigated to accommodate the seasonal differences in the number of residential fires. Results: From the index change, the number of residential fires increased at the beginning of each lockdown period. The timing of residential fires shifted during the day. Conclusions: These changes were associated with meal preparation or mealtimes. Adjustment to lockdowns as the global pandemic dragged on, such as changes to mealtimes, and getting used to lockdown life, are believed to be responsible for these changes.

Indexed as

Dwelling firesHome firesLockdownResidential fires

Identifiers

PMID36101751
PMCPMC9461550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.