Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36101750›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2022

Children's and young People's diabetes services: What works well and what doesn't?

N Kime, S Zwolinsky, A Pringle, F Campbell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

N KimeAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, United Kingdom.
S ZwolinskyWest Yorkshire and Harrogate Cancer Alliance, White Rose House, West Parade, Wakefield, WF1 1LT, United Kingdom.
A PringleSport, Outdoor & Exercise Science, School of Health Sciences and Human Sciences Research Centre, College of Science and Engineering, University of Derby, Derby, DE22 1GB, United Kingdom.
F CampbellChildren's Diabetes Centre, Level 1, Multi-Speciality Outpatients, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Derby · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The first year of care, post diagnosis, is pivotal for children and young people diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. This study evaluated a paediatric type 1 diabetes intervention, the 'First Year of Care', designed to maximise the care that newly diagnosed children and young people received. Study design: An observational mixed methods approach, underpinned by the Influencer Framework. Methods: A purposeful, non-probability sample of children and young people with type 1 diabetes and their families, and healthcare professionals were invited to take part. Data were collected through medical records of thirty-two newly diagnosed children and young people, plus thirty seven semi-structured interviews and exposure to six concurrent sources of influence through a questionnaire. Results: For many participants, HbA1c levels were within the optimal range by the time of their first clinic visit post-diagnosis and continued to stay within this range throughout the first year of care. Healthcare professionals prioritised the 'First Year of Care' intervention. Positive practices included: a cohesive and collaborative approach; patient-centred care; latest health technology and embedded structured education. Unusually, different multidisciplinary team members were located in one place.Data indicated statistically significant differences in total sources of influence score (t [35] = 2.331, p = 0.026); healthcare professionals' scores were higher compared to children. This suggests that children and young people have less social capital to self-manage their diabetes effectively. Greater encouragement and assistance from healthcare professionals and social networks may be needed. Conclusions: This paper identifies contemporary issues in practice and highlights the strengths and challenges for a paediatric diabetes intervention. The findings confirm the potential of layered approaches to behaviour change in managing type 1 diabetes across multiple domains of influence. Our study strongly suggests enhancing social motivation among children, young people and families to support successful long-term engagement in a paediatric diabetes intervention. Findings demonstrate healthcare professionals are key in delivering the intervention, along with opportunities to improve patient care, experience and outcomes.

Indexed as

EvaluationInfluencer frameworkIntervention implementationPaediatricsService improvementType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID36101750
PMCPMC9461571
OpenAlexW4280550306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.