ArticleHealth science reports2022
Acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of smartphone-based delivery of written educational materials in Iranian patients with coronary artery disease: A randomized control trial study.
Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital education for cardiac care readiness among coronary heart disease patients in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Global cardiology science & practice · 2026Review
- Sports and exercise-related smartphone use is antagonistic to hedonic use in regular exercisers: A cross-sectional study examining the roles of exercise frequency and duration.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Health Educational Methods for Improving Self-Efficacy Among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- The development of practice standards for patient education in nurse-led clinics: a mixed-method study.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of smartphone-based delivery of written educational materials in Iranian patients with coronary artery disease: A randomized control trial study.Health science reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Providing education to patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the crucial roles of nurses and, there are various education methods for these patients. This study aimed to investigate the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of smartphone-based delivery (SPBD) of written educational materials in Iranian patients with CAD. Methods: A total of 104 patients with CAD who were admitted to the cardiovascular unit of a large hospital in the northeast of Iran were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. When the standard educational content was provided, educational materials were delivered to the intervention group using a SPBD and to the control group using the routine print delivery (PD). The authors investigated the usability in the postintervention phase and information satisfaction and medication self-efficacy in the pre- and postintervention phases. Results: The mean age and the standard deviation of "patients" age in SPBD and PD groups was 51.8 ± 1.1 and 52.7 ± 1.3 years, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of mean information satisfaction score ( Conclusion: The SPBD method had the same usability as the PD method and at the same time this method was more effective in promoting medication self-efficacy. Therefore, SPBD could be used to educate patients with CAD and their caregivers and have appropriate effectiveness and acceptability among the Iranian population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.