Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36101704›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2022

Mapping global acceptance and uptake of COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qian Wang, Simeng Hu, Fanxing Du, Shujie Zang, Yuting Xing, Zhiqiang Qu, Xu Zhang, Leesa Lin, Zhiyuan Hou

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 45 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Qian Wang *School of Public Health, Global Health Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Simeng Hu *School of Public Health, Global Health Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fanxing DuSchool of Public Health, Global Health Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shujie ZangSchool of Public Health, Global Health Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuting XingSchool of Public Health, Global Health Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhiqiang QuSchool of Public Health, Global Health Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xu ZhangSchool of Public Health, Global Health Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Leesa LinDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Zhiyuan HouSchool of Public Health, Global Health Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3413-0076
Fudan University · CNLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic exit strategies depend on widespread acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines. We aim to estimate the global acceptance and uptake of COVID-19 vaccination, and their variations across populations, countries, time, and sociodemographic subgroups. Methods: We searched four peer-reviewed databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and EBSCO) for papers published in English from December 1, 2019 to February 27, 2022. This review included original survey studies which investigated acceptance or uptake of COVID-19 vaccination, and study quality was assessed using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. We reported the pooled acceptance or uptake rates and 95% confidence interval (CI) using meta-analysis with a random-effects model. Results: Among 15690 identified studies, 519 articles with 7,990,117 participants are eligible for meta-analysis. The global acceptance and uptake rate of COVID-19 vaccination are 67.8% (95% CI: 67.1-68.6) and 42.3% (95% CI: 38.2-46.5), respectively. Among all population groups, pregnant/breastfeeding women have the lowest acceptance (54.0%, 46.3-61.7) and uptake rates (7.3%, 1.7-12.8). The acceptance rate varies across countries, ranging from 35.9% (34.3-37.5) to 86.9% (81.4-92.5) for adults, and the lowest acceptance is found in Russia, Ghana, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria (below 50%). The acceptance rate declines globally in 2020, then recovers from December 2020 to June 2021, and further drops in late 2021. Females, those aged < 60 years old, Black individuals, those with lower education or income have the lower acceptance than their counterparts. There are large gaps (around 20%) between acceptance and uptake rates for populations with low education or income. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine acceptance needs to be improved globally. Continuous vaccine acceptance monitoring is necessary to inform public health decision making.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyPreventive medicinePublic health

Identifiers

PMID36101704
PMCPMC9465145
OpenAlexW4295234627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.