ArticleApplied physics. A, Materials science & processing2022
Tolerance effect of a shock-free atmospheric plasma on human skin.
Article in Applied physics. A, Materials science & processing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, a shock-free argon-fed plasma plume was generated by a variable-frequency power supply and the discharge characteristics were investigated from the voltage and current waveforms between 72 and 92 kHz frequencies. The higher electron temperature dominates the plasma chemical process and the average plasma temperature is about 30 ℃ under these conditions. The influence of non-thermal atmospheric plasma plume length and plume temperature on Ar gas flow is optimized at 7 sL/min. The average charge accumulation on the plume tip area and the dependence of flow rate on the plasma irradiation area were also explored. This atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) has been proposed for human-skin irradiation on different areas (even on the tongue) owing to its less painful, tingling and burning effect. Optical emission spectroscopy (OES) confirmed the presence of excited argon with reactive nitrogen (RNS) and oxygen species (ROS). This study contributes to a better understanding of non-thermal plasma effects on the human body which may find prospects for disinfection and prevention of different diseases during the current pandemic time. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00339-022-06022-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.