Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36101650›Full record

ArticleStochastic environmental research and risk assessment : research journal2022

Spatio-temporal estimation of wind speed and wind power using extreme learning machines: predictions, uncertainty and technical potential.

Federico Amato, Fabian Guignard, Alina Walch, Nahid Mohajeri, Jean-Louis Scartezzini, Mikhail Kanevski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment : research journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Federico Amato *Swiss Data Science Centre, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) and Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5886-9038
Fabian Guignard *Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Alina WalchSolar Energy and Building Physics Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nahid MohajeriInstitute of Environmental Design and Engineering, Bartlett School of Environment, Energy and Resources, University College London, London, UK.
Jean-Louis ScartezziniSolar Energy and Building Physics Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mikhail KanevskiInstitute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With wind power providing an increasing amount of electricity worldwide, the quantification of its spatio-temporal variations and the related uncertainty is crucial for energy planners and policy-makers. Here, we propose a methodological framework which (1) uses machine learning to reconstruct a spatio-temporal field of wind speed on a regular grid from spatially irregularly distributed measurements and (2) transforms the wind speed to wind power estimates. Estimates of both model and prediction uncertainties, and of their propagation after transforming wind speed to power, are provided without any assumptions on data distributions. The methodology is applied to study hourly wind power potential on a grid of Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00477-022-02219-w.

Indexed as

Big data miningExtreme learning machineMachine learningRenewable energyUncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID36101650
PMCPMC9463360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.