Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36101608›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2021

Factors associated with tetanus vaccination in pregnant women living in Minas Gerais State, Brazil: A cross-sectional study.

Ana Paula Vieira Faria, Thales Philipe Rodrigues da Silva, Ed Wilson Rodrigues Vieira, Sheila Aparecida Ferreira Lachtim, Edna Maria Rezende, Fernanda Penido Matozinhos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Paula Vieira FariaEscola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenue Alfredo Balena, 190 - Campus Saúde - Bairro Santa Efigênia, CEP 30130-100, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Thales Philipe Rodrigues da SilvaPost-Graduate Program in Health Sciences - Child and Adolescent Health, Medical School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenue Alfredo Balena, 190 - Campus Saúde - Bairro Santa Efigênia, CEP 30130-100, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ed Wilson Rodrigues VieiraDepartment of Maternal Nursing and Public Health, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenue Alfredo Balena, 190 - Campus Saúde - Bairro Santa Efigênia, CEP 30130-100, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Sheila Aparecida Ferreira LachtimDepartment of Maternal Nursing and Public Health, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenue Alfredo Balena, 190 - Campus Saúde - Bairro Santa Efigênia, CEP 30130-100, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Edna Maria RezendeDepartment of Maternal Nursing and Public Health, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenue Alfredo Balena, 190 - Campus Saúde - Bairro Santa Efigênia, CEP 30130-100, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Fernanda Penido MatozinhosDepartment of Maternal Nursing and Public Health, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenue Alfredo Balena, 190 - Campus Saúde - Bairro Santa Efigênia, CEP 30130-100, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immunization in pregnant women is essential to help controlling and avoiding preventable diseases. Aim: Analyzing some factors associated with non-vaccination against tetanus in pregnant women who gave birth in maternity hospitals in Belo Horizonte City, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Methods: Cross-sectional study carried out with database deriving from the research titled "Born in Belo Horizonte: Survey on childbirth", which was developed in public and private hospitals. Sample was calculated by taking into consideration the total number of births recorded in each investigated maternity hospital - the final sample comprised 481 mothers. Descriptive population statistics were used for data analysis purposes, whereas Poisson regression model was used to estimate factors associated with non-vaccination against tetanus during pregnancy. Results: The prevalence of puerperal women subjected to at least 2 doses of tetanus vaccine reached 59.2%. Adjusted analyses have shown that not living with a partner has increased by 1.58 times the prevalence of women who did not take tetanus vaccine, on average; that the prevalence of women who were not vaccinated has decreased by 0.65 times after each prenatal consultation, on average; that prenatal consultations with nurses have reduced by 0.52 times the prevalence of women who did not take the tetanus vaccine, on average. Conclusion: Almost half of puerperal women were not vaccinated against tetanus during pregnancy. It is essential identifying specific groups to help implementing and expanding preventive actions, such as immunization for pregnant women. Despite advances in public health policies, authorities still face challenges to expand vaccination coverage in the investigated state, as well as to strengthen the national immunization program to help increasing tetanus vaccination rates among pregnant women.

Indexed as

CI, confidence intervalsdT, diphtheria and tetanusDTpa, diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussisNDIS, Notifiable Diseases Information SystemNMT, neonatal and maternal tetanusPregnant womenQI, interquartile rangeTetanus toxoidVaccinationVaccination in pregnant womenVaccine coverageVaccinesWHO, World Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID36101608
PMCPMC9461510
OpenAlexW3202533645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.