Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36101590›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2021

Implementation status of national airborne infection control guidelines in the health care facilities of a North Indian State: A mixed method study.

Pallvi Kaushal, Garima Sangwan, Kirtan Rana, Manisha Biswal, Manmeet Kaur, P V M Lakshmi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Implementation Status of Airborne Infection Control Measures in Primary and Secondary Public Health Facilities, Puducherry: A Mixed-Methods Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pallvi KaushalDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Garima SangwanDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Kirtan RanaDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Manisha BiswalDepartment of Medical Microbiology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Manmeet KaurDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
P V M LakshmiDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Healthcare-acquired infection (HCAIs), have become a significant cause of morbidity as well as mortality among the hospitalized patients and health care workers. The implementation of air-borne infection control measures play an important role in prevention of health care acquired infections (HCAIs). Hence, this study was planned to assess the implementation status of National Airborne Infection Control Guidelines in the health care settings of a North Indian State. Study design: A mixed method study was planned in all the 13 health facilities of Himachal Pradesh having both the Anti-Retroviral Therapy (ART) Centre and Directly observed Treatment Short course (DOTS) for TB center in the same facility. Methods: The implementation of airborne infection control measures was evaluated using a Standardized Health Care Facility Airborne Infection Risk Assessment Tool and an observational checklist. In-depth interviews are conducted with hospital staff. At all health facilities, risk assessment and implementation of airborne infection control was evaluated by using a pretested semi-structured questionnaire. The qualitative data was analyzed manually and transcripts prepared from hand written notes and audio tape records were analyzed thematically. Results: Only 5 out of 13 health facilities were having specially designated airborne infection control committee. The incidence of tuberculosis among hospital staff was 2.32% at secondary level health care facilities and 0.35% at tertiary care level health facilities. Among the tuberculosis cases, maximum were nursing staff (59.5%) as compared to other categories of health care workers. Improper functioning of health care system and individual factors were main reasons for deficiencies in the implementation of air-borne infection control measures. Conclusion: The health care facilities were not implementing the infection control measure to the fullest both at secondary and tertiary care health facilities. There is a need to set up the surveillance of airborne infections in the hospital and especially the passive surveillance of tuberculosis among health care workers.

Indexed as

Control of healthcare acquired infectionsHealthcare acquired infectionsTransmission of healthcare acquired infections

Identifiers

PMID36101590
PMCPMC9461529
OpenAlexW3169442554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.