Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36101585›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2021

Lessons learned from a rural, community-based cervical cancer screen-and-treat pilot study in Malawi.

Laura Limarzi Klyn, John Chapola, Clement Mapanje, Agatha Bula, Jennifer H Tang, Satish Gopal, Nelecy Chome, Billy Phiri, Lameck Chinula

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura Limarzi KlynUniversity of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
John ChapolaUniversity of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Clement MapanjeUniversity of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Agatha BulaUniversity of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Jennifer H TangUniversity of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Satish GopalUniversity of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Nelecy ChomeUniversity of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Billy PhiriUniversity of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Lameck ChinulaUniversity of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
University of Malawi · MWUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Invasive cervical cancer (ICC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death among women in Malawi. Barriers to screening for ICC in Malawi, such as long distances to health facilities and lack of public education about ICC, have hindered participation of women in ICC prevention programs. Given the burden of disease and barriers to screening, we implemented a community-based ICC screen-and-treat pilot study and present its successes and challenges. Study design: This study was a screen-and-treat pilot study using Visual Inspection with Acetic acid (VIA) for screening and same-day thermal ablation for treatment of pre-cancerous lesions. The pilot was implemented in four rural community settings in Lilongwe District, Malawi. Methods: With consultation from local leaders, as well as the UNC Project-Malawi Community Department and the Community Advisory Board, a team of researchers designed a rural, community-based ICC screen-and-treat pilot study. Over a 5-week period, we travelled to four rural communities to provide information about and screening for ICC and HIV through our study. The four selected rural locations were about an hour drive from Lilongwe City, Malawi. Detailed field notes were taken by study staff and then later analyzed and categorized as either strengths or challenges. Results: Successes included support from local leaders, high uptake of screening (408 women underwent VIA, representing 88% of eligible women), positive experiences during screening, and good communication between study staff and participants. This communication enabled us to quickly address misperceptions about the study intent and procedures and to better understand some of the barriers to care. Challenges included insufficient medication for diagnosed sexually transmitted infections, finding ways to engage interested women who were ineligible due to young age, and not screening interested women because they needed male partner approval. Conclusion: Community-based screen-and-treat programs with thermal ablation for ICC can be an effective way to engage hard-to-reach women in ICC preventive care. Our findings support existing literature which suggests that involvement of local leadership, women from the community, and their male partners, as well as ongoing peer education, may facilitate greater participation in ICC screening and treatment. In addition, we found ongoing communication between study staff and participants to be mutually beneficial. Finally, we suggest that future interventions consider bundling sexually transmitted infection treatment into ICC preventive care when engaging hard-to-reach populations.

Indexed as

Community-basedInvasive cervical cancerMalawiRuralScreen-and-treatThermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID36101585
PMCPMC9461538
OpenAlexW3146415629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.