ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2021
A scoping review on health education programs for improving Men's engagement with health services in low- and middle- income countries.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward a common lexicon in gender analysis for global health programs and policies.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- Prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension and associated factors among Royal Thai Army personnel in Thailand from 2017 to 2021.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to map evidence on health education programs (HEPs) for men engagement in health services in LMICs to guide future research. Study design: A scoping review was conducted. Methods: We searched Google Scholar, PubMed, EBSCOhost (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Health Source, Nursing, Academic Edition and Academic Search Complete) and WEB of Science electronic databases for publications from January 2000 to March 2019. We also searched Researchgate, the WHO library, and universities repositories for grey literature such as dissertations, theses, and reports. The search terms included "health," "education," "program," "men", with Boolean terms, AND and OR, being used to separate the keywords. Articles reporting evidence on HEPs for men aged 15 and older in LMICs and HEPs improving men's engagement in health services in LMICs published in any language between January 2000 to March 2019 were included in this review. We appraised included studies using the 2018 version of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We used thematic content analysis to extract emerging themes and presented a narrative account of the findings. Results: Database search retrieved 8905 eligible articles. Of these, only six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for data extraction. All included studies reported evidence of health education for men engagement in health services. The total number of men reported in the studies was 4372 with an age range of 15-54. Included studies were conducted in Uganda, Kenya, Ghana, and Zimbabwe. Included studies presented evidence on HEPs for men engagement in health services. Two main themes emerged from thematic content analysis of included studies: mode of health delivery (the process of enabling men and boys to become involved in health services as patients/clients) and health benefits to men (to achieve better health outcomes). Conclusion: Our review revealed limited evidence of HEPs for men engagement in health service. Regardless of mode of health education delivery, notable health benefits to men were reported. We recommend implementation research on HEPs for men engagement in health services to better understand the social, cultural and economic influences in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.