ArticlePsychiatric research and clinical practice2019
Shared Decision-Making Tool for Treatment of Perinatal Opioid Use Disorder.
Article in Psychiatric research and clinical practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for opioid use disorder during pregnancy: a scoping review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Trends, challenges, and priorities for shared decision making in mental health: The first umbrella review.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Treatment preferences of patients receiving opioid agonist therapy in spain: a discrete choice experiment.Addictive behaviors reports · 2026Article
- Understanding barriers and facilitators to women's recovery from opioid use disorder: A focus group study.Journal of social work practice in the addictions · 2026Article
- Provider Perspectives of Conversations and Practices Surrounding Perinatal Cannabis Use.Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.) · 2026Article
- Gender-specific addiction research needed now more than ever: Reflections from 25 years of the NIDA Clinical Trials Network Gender Special Interest Group.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2025Article
- "That would be such a game changer": A qualitative study of the acceptability and feasibility of a digital harm reduction support tool among people who use drugs.Research square · 2025Article
- Perinatal healthcare experiences of pregnant and parenting people with a history of substance use disorder: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Perspectives of the Obstetric Care Environment for Pregnant Individuals Who Have an Opioid Use Disorder.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Mobile Health Information and Decision Support System Architecture: Enhancing Maternal Healthcare Access in Uganda.The East African health research journal · 2025Article
- Reproductive Psychiatry: Postpartum Depression is Only the Tip of the Iceberg.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2024Article
- The Psychiatrist's Role in Treating Perinatal Opioid Use Disorder and Reducing Maternal Mortality.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2024Review
- Prescribed and Penalized: The Detrimental Impact of Mandated Reporting for Prenatal Utilization of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder.Maternal and child health journal · 2023Article
- Patient-Provider Shared Decision-Making, Trust, and Opioid Misuse Among US Veterans Prescribed Long-Term Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Qualitative Exploration of Emergency Department Care Experiences Among People With Opioid Use Disorder.Annals of emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Shared Decision Making in Acute Pain Management in Patients with Opioid Use Disorder: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Interventions to Support Engagement in Addiction Care Postpartum: Principles and Pitfalls.Substance abuse and rehabilitation · 2023Review
- "You have to take this medication, but then you get punished for taking it:" lack of agency, choice, and fear of medications to treat opioid use disorder across the perinatal period.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2022Article
- Listening to women and pregnant and postpartum people: Qualitative research to inform opioid use disorder treatment for pregnant and postpartum people.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2022Article
- A retrospective, observational study on medication for opioid use disorder during pregnancy and risk for neonatal abstinence syndrome.Family practice · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study examined the proportion of pregnant women with opioid use disorder (OUD) who made a decision to continue or taper pharmacotherapy for the treatment of OUD after using a shared decision-making aid and determined whether the aid reflected the principles of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). Methods: A shared decision-making aid was developed with the IPDAS instrument to assist pregnant women with OUD receiving care at an outpatient obstetrics clinic in their decision to continue or taper pharmacotherapy for the treatment of OUD. After using the aid, the women (N=22) completed an anonymous survey about the extent to which the aid adhered to IPDAS principles. Results: Eighty-two percent (22 of 27) of eligible participants agreed to take part in the study. After the shared decision-making process, 95% (21 of 22) reported choosing to either continue (64%, 14 of 22) or taper (36%, 8 of 22) pharmacotherapy for the treatment of OUD. Participants agreed that they were provided with sufficient information (96%, 21 of 22), outcome probabilities (91%, 20 of 22), and decisional guidance (86%-95% [19 and 21 of 22, respectively]) to make an informed decision. Further, women reported that their choice reflected their values and preferences (77%-91% [17 and 20 of 22, respectively]). Conclusions: This shared decision aid provides a tool for providers to use with pregnant women with OUD to ensure that patients make informed treatment decisions that reflect their individual preferences and values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.