ArticleHealth information science and systems2022
Exploring relationship between emotion and probiotics with knowledge graphs.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Food Safety: Decoding Gut Microbiota-Mediated Health Effects of Non-Microbial Contaminants.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Researchers have identified gut microbiota that interact with brain regions associated with emotion and mood. Literature reviews of those associations rely on rigorous systematic approaches and labor-intensive investments. Here we explore how knowledge graph, a large scale semantic network consisting of entities and concepts as well as the semantic relationships among them, is incorporated into the emotion-probiotic relationship exploration work. Method: We propose an end-to-end emotion-probiotics relationship exploration method with an integrated medical knowledge graph, which incorporates the text mining output of knowledge graph, concept reasoning and evidence classification. Specifically, a knowledge graph for probiotics is built based on a text-mining analysis of PubMed, and further used to retrieve triples of relationships with reasoning logistics. Then specific relationships are annotated and evidence levels are retrieved to form a new evidence-based emotion-probiotic knowledge graph. Results: Based on the probiotics knowledge graph with 40,442,404 triples, totally 1453 PubMed articles were annotated in both the title level and abstract level, and the evidence levels were incorporated to the visualization of the explored emotion-probiotic relationships. Finally, we got 4131 evidenced emotion-probiotic associations. Conclusions: The evidence-based emotion-probiotic knowledge graph construction work demonstrates an effective reasoning based pipeline of relationship exploration. The annotated relationship associations are supposed be used to help researchers generate scientific hypotheses or create their own semantic graphs for their research interests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.