Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36101543›Full record

ArticleBMJ neurology open2022

Spinal cord stimulation therapy for patients with Parkinson's disease and gait problems (STEP-PD): study protocol for an exploratory, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled feasibility trial.

Victor S Hvingelby, Miriam Højholt Terkelsen, Erik L Johnsen, Mette Møller, Erik Hvid Danielsen, Tove Henriksen, Andreas Nørgaard Glud, Yen Tai, Anne Sofie Møller Andersen, Kaare Meier and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ neurology open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05110053 (Spinal Cord sTimulation thEraPy for Parkinson's Disease Patients With Gait Problems), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05110053 nacompletednot on this map

Spinal Cord sTimulation thEraPy for Parkinson's Disease Patients With Gait Problems

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2021 to 2024Enrolled12ConditionsParkinson Disease, Gait Disorders, Neurologic, Fall InjuryArmsSpinal Cord Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Surgical Advances in Parkinson's Disease.Current neuropharmacology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Victor S HvingelbyDepartment of Clinical Medicine-Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4915-7899
Miriam Højholt TerkelsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine-Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0971-3747
Erik L JohnsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mette MøllerDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Erik Hvid DanielsenDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tove HenriksenDepartment of Neurology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas Nørgaard GludDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3339-6120
Yen TaiDepartment of Neurosciences, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3987-0113
Anne Sofie Møller AndersenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kaare MeierDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7677-406X
Per BorghammerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6391-8052
Elena MoroDepartment of Psychiatry, Neurology, Neurological Rehabilitation and Forensic Medicine, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.
Jens Christian Hedemann SørensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Nicola PaveseDepartment of Clinical Medicine-Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6801-6194
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T023880/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gait difficulties are common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and cause significant disability. These symptoms are often resistant to treatment. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been found to improve gait, including freezing of gait, in a small number of patients with PD. The mechanism of action is unclear, and some patients are non-responders. With this double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and feasibility clinical and imaging study, we aim to shed light on the mechanism of action of SCS and collect data to inform development of a scientifically sound clinical trial protocol. We also aim to identify clinical and imaging biomarkers at baseline that could be predictive of a favourable or a negative outcome of SCS and improve patient selection. Methods and analysis: A total of 14 patients will be assessed with clinical rating scales and gait evaluations at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation. They will also receive serial Ethics and dissemination: This study was reviewed and approved by the Committee on Health Research Ethics, Central Denmark RM. It is funded by the Danish Council for Independent Research. Independent of outcome, the results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. Trial registration number: NCT05110053; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier.

Indexed as

ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONGAITPARKINSON'S DISEASERANDOMISED TRIALS

Identifiers

PMID36101543
PMCPMC9413283
OpenAlexW4292939299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.