ArticleThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS2022
A Comparison of the Effects of Prolonged Infusion of Propofol 2% and 1% During Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Using Target-Controlled Infusion Technique for Elective Neurosurgery.
Article in The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biochemical and pharmacological characterization of propofol infusion syndrome risk markers following high-dose propofol.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with a combination of target-controlled infusions (TCIs) of propofol and remifentanil has been advocated for a favourable neurosurgical outcome. Neurosurgical procedures often involve a prolonged duration and large cumulative infusion of propofol. This study compares the serial serum lipid profile, acid-base balance and lactate level of neurosurgical patients anaesthetised with TCIs of propofol at 2% versus 1%. Methods: A total of 74 patients who underwent an elective craniotomy under general anaesthesia were randomised into two groups: i) propofol 1% ( Results: The total volume of propofol used was significantly lower in the 2% group than the 1% group (157.19 mL [SD = 77.14] versus 335.17 mL [SD = 174.27]; Conclusion: Both concentrations of propofol, 1% and 2%, were comparable in terms of the serial lipid profile, acid-base balance and lactate level during TIVA using TCIs for elective neurosurgery. The benefits of propofol at 2% were that a lower volume was used and there were fewer syringe changes, which could minimise anaesthesia interruption throughout surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.