Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36101501›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2023

Systemic control of plant regeneration and wound repair.

Moutasem Omary, Rotem Matosevich, Idan Efroni

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Functional Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. PlantForestry research · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Transcriptomic responses of oil palm (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Moutasem OmaryThe Institute of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University, Rehovot, 761000, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6546-2183
Rotem MatosevichThe Institute of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University, Rehovot, 761000, Israel.
Idan EfroniThe Institute of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University, Rehovot, 761000, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0219-8685
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants have a broad capacity to regenerate damaged organs. The study of wounding in multiple developmental systems has uncovered many of the molecular properties underlying plants' competence for regeneration at the local cellular level. However, in nature, wounding is rarely localized to one place, and plants need to coordinate regeneration responses at multiple tissues with environmental conditions and their physiological state. Here, we review the evidence for systemic signals that regulate regeneration on a plant-wide level. We focus on the role of auxin and sugars as short- and long-range signals in natural wounding contexts and discuss the varied origin of these signals in different regeneration scenarios. Together, this evidence calls for a broader, system-wide view of plant regeneration competence.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsIndoleacetic AcidsPlant RootsPlantsArabidopsis ProteinsIndoleacetic Acidsadventitious rootsauxingraft junctionregenerationsugar transport

Identifiers

PMID36101501
PMCPMC10092612
OpenAlexW4295759724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.