Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36101405›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

Machine Learning Algorithms Highlight tRNA Information Content and Chargaff's Second Parity Rule Score as Important Features in Discriminating Probiotics from Non-Probiotics.

Carlo M Bergamini, Nicoletta Bianchi, Valerio Giaccone, Paolo Catellani, Leonardo Alberghini, Alessandra Stella, Stefano Biffani, Sachithra Kalhari Yaddehige, Tania Bobbo, Cristian Taccioli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Applications of Probiotics and Their Potential Health Benefits.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carlo M BergaminiDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Nicoletta BianchiDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9280-6017
Valerio GiacconeDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health (MAPS), University of Padua, Via F. Marzolo 5, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Paolo CatellaniDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health (MAPS), University of Padua, Via F. Marzolo 5, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8403-5459
Leonardo AlberghiniDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health (MAPS), University of Padua, Via F. Marzolo 5, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0172-3054
Alessandra StellaConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Istituto di Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria (IBBA), Via Edoardo Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Stefano BiffaniConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Istituto di Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria (IBBA), Via Edoardo Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5559-3630
Sachithra Kalhari YaddehigeDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health (MAPS), University of Padua, Via F. Marzolo 5, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Tania BobboConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Istituto di Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria (IBBA), Via Edoardo Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0328-8903
Cristian TaccioliDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health (MAPS), University of Padua, Via F. Marzolo 5, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2995-5612

Funding

MAPS Department, University of Padova BIRD213010/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotic bacteria are microorganisms with beneficial effects on human health and are currently used in numerous food supplements. However, no selection process is able to effectively distinguish probiotics from non-probiotic organisms on the basis of their genomic characteristics. In the current study, four Machine Learning algorithms were employed to accurately identify probiotic bacteria based on their DNA characteristics. Although the prediction accuracies of all algorithms were excellent, the Neural Network returned the highest scores in all the evaluation metrics, managing to discriminate probiotics from non-probiotics with an accuracy greater than 90%. Interestingly, our analysis also highlighted the information content of the tRNA sequences as the most important feature in distinguishing the two groups of organisms probably because tRNAs have regulatory functions and might have allowed probiotics to evolve faster in the human gut environment. Through the methodology presented here, it was also possible to identify seven promising new probiotics that have a higher information content in their tRNA sequences compared to non-probiotics. In conclusion, we prove for the first time that Machine Learning methods can discriminate human probiotic from non-probiotic organisms underlining information within tRNA sequences as the most important genomic feature in distinguishing them.

Indexed as

Chargaff’s Second Parity ruleMachine LearningprobioticsShannon’s EntropytRNA

Identifiers

PMID36101405
PMCPMC9311688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.