Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36101396›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

Goats as Valuable Animal Model to Test the Targeted Glutamate Supplementation upon Antral Follicle Number, Ovulation Rate, and LH-Pulsatility.

Luis A Luna-García, César A Meza-Herrera, Carlos C Pérez-Marín, Rebeca Corona, Juan R Luna-Orozco, Francisco G Véliz-Deras, Ramón Delgado-Gonzalez, Rafael Rodriguez-Venegas, Cesar A Rosales-Nieto, Jorge A Bustamante-Andrade and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Metabolism and Nutrition of L-Glutamate and L-Glutamine in Ruminants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luis A Luna-GarcíaUniversidad Autónoma Chapingo, Unidad Regional Universitaria de Zonas Áridas, Bermejillo 35230, Durango, Mexico.
César A Meza-HerreraUniversidad Autónoma Chapingo, Unidad Regional Universitaria de Zonas Áridas, Bermejillo 35230, Durango, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0289-2009
Carlos C Pérez-MarínDepartamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Campus Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9574-383X
Rebeca CoronaDepartamento de Neurobiología Celular y Molecular, Laboratorio de Neuroanatomía Funcional y Neuroendocrinología, Instituto de Neurobiología, UNAM, Querétaro 76230, Mexico.
Juan R Luna-OrozcoCentro de Bachillerato Tecnológico Agropecuario No. 1, Torreón 27000, Coahuila, Mexico.
Francisco G Véliz-DerasUniversidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Unidad Laguna, Torreón 27054, Coahuila, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5105-1508
Ramón Delgado-GonzalezUniversidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Unidad Laguna, Torreón 27054, Coahuila, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3018-232X
Rafael Rodriguez-VenegasUniversidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Unidad Laguna, Torreón 27054, Coahuila, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7670-9425
Cesar A Rosales-NietoFacultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí 78321, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3414-338X
Jorge A Bustamante-AndradeFacultad de Agricultura y Zootecnia, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Venecia Durango 35111, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1642-3916
Ulises N Gutierrez-GuzmanFacultad de Agricultura y Zootecnia, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Venecia Durango 35111, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-6409-1947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential effect of intravenous administration of glutamate on the ovarian activity and the LH secretion pattern, considering the anestrous yearling goat as an animal model, were assessed. In late April, yearling goats (n = 20) were randomly assigned to either (1) Glutamate supplemented (GLUT; n = 10, Live Weight (LW) = 29.6 ± 1.02 kg, Body Condition (BCS) = 3.4 ± 0.2 units; i.v. supplemented with 7 mg GLUT kg−1 LW) or (2) Non-supplemented (CONT; n = 10; LW = 29.2 ± 1.07 kg, BCS = 3.5 ± 0.2 units; i.v. saline). The oats were estrus-synchronized; blood sampling (6 h × 15 min) was carried out for LH quantification. Response variables included pulsatility (PULSE), time to first pulse (TTFP), amplitude (AMPL), nadir (NAD), and area under the curve (AUC) of LH. Ovaries were ultra-sonographically scanned to assess ovulation rate (OR), number of antral follicles (AF), and total ovarian activity (TOA = OR + AF). LH-PULSE was quantified with the Munro algorithm; significant treatment x time interactions were evaluated across time. The variables LW and BCS did not differ (p > 0.05) between the experimental groups. Nevertheless, OR (1.77 vs. 0.87 ± 0.20 units), TOA (4.11 vs. 1.87 ± 0.47 units) and LH-PULSE (5.0 vs. 2.2 pulses 6 h-1) favored (p < 0.05) to the GLUT group. Our results reveal that targeted glutamate supplementation, the main central nervous system neurotransmitter, arose as an interesting strategy to enhance the hypothalamic−hypophyseal−ovarian response considering the anestrous-yearling goat as an animal model, with thought-provoking while promising translational applications.

Indexed as

animal modelsglutamategoatsLHovarian functiontranslational models

Identifiers

PMID36101396
PMCPMC9311901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.