ArticleBiology2022
Phenotypic and Genotypic Detection of Biofilm-Forming
Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- The prevalence of adhesion and biofilm genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine mastitis: A comprehensive meta-analysis.Veterinary medicine and science · 2024Pooled it
- Virulence Determinants, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Biofilm Formation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrated DFT and Cyclic Voltammetry Approach for Screening Redox-Active Knoevenagel Adducts with Potential Antioxidant Applicability.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Draft genome sequence and annotations of the mastitis-associated multidrug-resistantMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026Article
- Multidrug-ResistantVeterinary medicine international · 2026Article
- Article
- Biofilm Formation, Virulence Traits, and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant and Biofilm-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Antibiotic Resistance, Biofilm Formation, and Molecular Epidemiology of FoodborneFood science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Preliminary survey of biofilm forming, antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in fishes from land based aquaculture systems and open water bodies in Bangladesh.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microbial Contamination and Food Safety (Volume I).Biology · 2025Article
- ZnO nanoparticles induced biofilm formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus at sub-inhibitory concentrations.Folia microbiologica · 2024Article
- Assessment of prevalence, antibiotic resistance, and virulence profiles of biofilm-formingHeliyon · 2024Article
- Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in healthy dairy cows in Algeria: antibiotic resistance, enterotoxin genes and biofilm formation.BMC veterinary research · 2024Article
- Antibiogram profiling and detection ofJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024Article
- Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Screening of antibiogram, virulence factors, and biofilm production ofOpen veterinary journal · 2024Article
- Genomic Insights of a Methicillin-Resistant Biofilm-ProducingBioMed research international · 2024Article
- Study on the microbial diversity of ear canal secretions from patients with otomycosis.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is a major foodborne pathogen. The ability of S. aureus to produce biofilm is a significant virulence factor, triggering its persistence in hostile environments. In this study, we screened a total of 420 different food samples and human hand swabs to detect S. aureus and to determine their biofilm formation ability. Samples analyzed were meat, milk, eggs, fish, fast foods, and hand swabs. S. aureus were detected by culturing, staining, biochemical, and PCR. Biofilm formation ability was determined by Congo Red Agar (CRA) plate and Crystal Violet Microtiter Plate (CVMP) tests. The icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD, and bap genes involved in the synthesis of biofilm-forming intracellular adhesion compounds were detected by PCR. About 23.81% (100/420; 95% CI: 14.17−29.98%) of the samples harbored S. aureus, as revealed by detection of the nuc gene. The CRA plate test revealed 20% of S. aureus isolates as strong biofilm producers and 69% and 11% as intermediate and non-biofilm producers, respectively. By the CVMP staining method, 20%, 77%, and 3% of the isolates were found to be strong, intermediate, and non-biofilm producers. Furthermore, 21% of S. aureus isolates carried at least one biofilm-forming gene, where icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD, and bap genes were detected in 15%, 20%, 7%, 20%, and 10% of the S. aureus isolates, respectively. Bivariate analysis showed highly significant correlations (p < 0.001) between any of the two adhesion genes of S. aureus isolates. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in Bangladesh describing the detection of biofilm-forming S. aureus from foods and hand swabs using molecular-based evidence. Our findings suggest that food samples should be deemed a potential reservoir of biofilm-forming S. aureus, which indicates a potential public health significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.