Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36100816›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2022

Vibration Measurements of the Gerbil Eardrum Under Quasi-static Pressure Sweeps.

Orhun Kose, W Robert J Funnell, Sam J Daniel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Orhun KoseDepartment of BioMedical Engineering, McGill University, 3775 rue University, Montréal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.
W Robert J FunnellDepartment of BioMedical Engineering, McGill University, 3775 rue University, Montréal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada. robert.funnell@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7145-4590
Sam J DanielDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
McGill University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tympanometry provides an objective measurement of the status of the middle ear. During tympanometry, the ear-canal pressure is varied, while the response of the ear to sound pressure is measured. The effects of the pressure on the mechanics of the middle ear are not well understood. This study is a continuation of our previous work in which the vibration response of the gerbil eardrum was measured in vivo under quasi-static pressure steps. In this study, we delivered a continuous pressure sweep to the middle ear and measured the vibration response at four locations for six gerbils. Vibrations were recorded using a single-point laser Doppler vibrometer and glass-coated reflective beads (diameter ~ 40 µm) at the umbo and on the mid-manubrium, posterior pars tensa and anterior pars tensa.The vibration magnitudes were similar to those in the previous step-wise pressurization experiments. Most gerbils showed repeatability within less than 10 dB for consecutive cycles. As described in the previous study, as the frequency was increased at ambient pressure, the vibration magnitude on the manubrium increased slightly to a broad peak (referred to as R1) and then decreased until a small peak appeared (referred to as R2), followed by multiple peaks and troughs as the magnitude decreased further. The low-frequency vibration magnitude (at 1 kHz) decreased monotonically as the pressure became more negative except for a dip (about 500 Pa wide) that occurred between - 700 and - 1800 Pa. The lowest overall magnitude was recorded in the dip at mid-manubrium. The vibration magnitudes also decreased as the middle-ear pressure was made more positive and were larger than those at negative pressures. R1 was only visible at negative and small positive middle-ear pressures, while R2 was visible for both positive and negative pressures. R2 split into multiple branches after the middle-ear pressure became slightly positive. No magnitude dip was visible for positive middle-ear pressures.The low-frequency vibration magnitudes at negative middle-ear pressures on the pars tensa were higher than those on the manubrium. R1 was not visible for large negative middle-ear pressures on the pars tensa. R2 appeared as a multi-peak feature on the pars tensa as well, and a higher-frequency branch on the posterior pars tensa appeared as a trough on the anterior pars tensa. The magnitude dip was not present on the pars tensa. The largest overall magnitude was recorded at the R2 peak on the posterior pars tensa.The results of this study expand on the findings of the step-wise pressurization experiments and provide further insight into the evolution of the vibration response of the eardrum under quasi-static pressures.

Indexed as

Tympanic MembraneVibrationAnimalsEar, MiddleGerbillinaeSoundEardrumLaser Doppler vibrometryMiddle earStatic pressureTympanometryVibration

Identifiers

PMID36100816
PMCPMC9789261
OpenAlexW4295419455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.